FNGG vs. COTG
FNGG (Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FNGG is passively managed, while COTG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. FNGG charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
FNGG vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGG achieves a 28.89% return, which is significantly higher than COTG's 17.32% return.
FNGG
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- 23.02%
- YTD
- 28.89%
- 6M
- 17.02%
- 1Y
- 55.32%
- 3Y*
- 62.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- 17.32%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNGG vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 28.89% | -8.51% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 17.32% | -21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGG and COTG is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGG vs. COTG — Risk / Return Rank
FNGG
COTG
FNGG vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNGG | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.42 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNGG | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | -0.28 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
FNGG vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGG drawdown since its inception was -91.33%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGG and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGG | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.33% | -25.69% | -65.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.67% | -23.48% | +18.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.04% | -8.35% | -47.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.25% | — | — |
Volatility
FNGG vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGG | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.61% | 40.65% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.64% | 40.65% | +26.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.64% | 40.65% | +26.99% |
FNGG vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGG has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNGG vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
FNGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.20%, while COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 9.20% | 11.89% | 0.79% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 4.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGG and COTG have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for FNGG.
FNGG has the higher dividend yield at 9.20%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for FNGG and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for FNGG and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer