FNGG vs. COTG
FNGG (Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FNGG is passively managed, while COTG is actively managed. Their -0.25 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FNGG charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
FNGG vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGG achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 12.60% return.
FNGG
- 1D
- 3.83%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 20.01%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 1Y
- 22.57%
- 3Y*
- 46.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.19%
COTG
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- 6M
- -3.87%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $653.21K | $1.05M | $1.51M | |
| $659.98K | $756.57K | $1.71M |
FNGG vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 11.69% | -6.03% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 12.60% | -22.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGG and COTG is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGG vs. COTG — Risk / Return Rank
FNGG
COTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FNGG vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNGG | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNGG vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGG drawdown since its inception was -91.33%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -32.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGG and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGG | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.33% | -32.16% | -59.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.39% | -26.56% | +9.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.74% | -11.97% | -42.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.59% | — | — |
Volatility
FNGG vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGG | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.43% | 40.99% | +3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.29% | 40.99% | +26.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.29% | 40.99% | +26.30% |
FNGG vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGG has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNGG vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
FNGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.66%, while COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 10.66% | 11.89% | 0.79% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 4.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGG and COTG have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for FNGG.
FNGG has the higher dividend yield at 10.66%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for FNGG and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for FNGG and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer