FNGD vs. XTAP

Last updated Aug 3, 2026

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FNGD is passively managed, while XTAP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNGD returned -63.24%/yr vs 10.76%/yr for XTAP. Their -0.76 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FNGD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTAP.

Performance

FNGD vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGD achieves a -34.80% return, which is significantly lower than XTAP's 12.47% return.

FNGD

• 1D: -5.03%
• 1M: -4.69%
• 6M: -39.93%
• YTD: -34.80%
• 1Y: -48.33%
• 3Y*: -64.85%
• 5Y*: -63.24%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -69.95%

XTAP

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 1.02%
• 6M: 11.93%
• YTD: 12.47%
• 1Y: 19.11%
• 3Y*: 16.76%
• 5Y*: 10.76%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	$13.50M	$14.88M	$20.27M
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF	$36.55K	$24.82K	$30.58K

FNGD vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-34.80%	-61.42%	-76.57%	-90.14%	52.21%	-47.51%
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF	12.47%	17.58%	14.26%	23.46%	-14.68%	12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGD and XTAP is -0.71, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.71
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.73
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	-0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021	-0.76

The correlation between FNGD and XTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.77 to -0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNGD vs. XTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNGD	XTAP
Technology	59.6%	39.1%
Communication Services	30.0%	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	9.9%
Financial Services	10.0%	10.9%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.5%
Energy	-	3.1%
Healthcare	-	8.3%
Industrials	-	7.8%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

FNGD vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNGD

FNGD Risk / Return Rank: 4
FNGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FNGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FNGD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FNGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FNGD Martin Ratio Rank: 2

XTAP

XTAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
XTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
XTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
XTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNGD vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNGD	XTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.67	3.73	-4.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.76	6.04	-6.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.92	-1.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.68	10.71	-11.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	54.76	-56.02

FNGD vs. XTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGD Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the XTAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGD and XTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNGD vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGD drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGD and XTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGD	XTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-22.13%	-77.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.92%	-1.72%	-64.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-97.35%	-11.83%	-85.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.67%	-22.13%	-77.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-100.00%	0.00%	-100.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-87.46%	-3.36%	-84.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	35.26%	0.34%	+34.92%

Volatility

FNGD vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) has a higher volatility of 18.15% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 1.60%. This indicates that FNGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGD	XTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.15%	1.60%	+16.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.65%	4.02%	+50.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.81%	4.93%	+61.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	89.78%	14.53%	+75.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.95%	14.23%	+76.72%

FNGD vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNGD vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGD nor XTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGD and XTAP in my portfolio?

FNGD and XTAP have a correlation of -0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNGD or XTAP?

FNGD has higher volatility (18.15%) compared to XTAP (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGD dropped -100.00% vs XTAP's -22.13%.

Which ETF is better, FNGD or XTAP?

On 5-year performance, XTAP leads with 10.76% vs -63.24% for FNGD. On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNGD or XTAP?

Over the 5-year period, XTAP has performed better with a 10.76% return vs -63.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNGD or XTAP?

XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FNGD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNGD or XTAP?

FNGD and XTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FNGD and XTAP?

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FNGD and 0.79% for XTAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.