PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGD vs. TSLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNGD vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FNGD vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FNGD
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
40.23%-61.42%6.72%
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-35.84%-26.70%-16.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGD achieves a 40.23% return, which is significantly higher than TSLG's -35.84% return.


FNGD

1D
-13.84%
1M
10.30%
YTD
40.23%
6M
44.34%
1Y
-59.51%
3Y*
-65.85%
5Y*
-59.96%
10Y*

TSLG

1D
9.07%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
-35.84%
6M
-39.88%
1Y
34.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNGD vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FNGD vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGD
FNGD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FNGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGD Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGD Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGD vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNGDTSLGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.76

0.32

-1.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.93

1.26

-2.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.15

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

0.59

-1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.82

1.27

-2.09

FNGD vs. TSLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGD Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the TSLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGD and TSLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNGDTSLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.76

0.32

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.75

-0.44

-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between FNGD and TSLG is -0.53. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

FNGD vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

FNGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.20%.


Drawdowns

FNGD vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGD drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than TSLG's maximum drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGD and TSLG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGDTSLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-82.86%

-17.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.53%

-50.92%

-31.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-67.59%

-32.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.98%

-58.04%

-28.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

71.84%

23.82%

+48.02%

Volatility

FNGD vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) has a higher volatility of 24.51% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) at 22.28%. This indicates that FNGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FNGDTSLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.51%

22.28%

+2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.21%

59.35%

-14.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.65%

110.61%

-31.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.85%

119.00%

-30.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.51%

119.00%

-27.49%