FNGD vs. SOXL
FNGD (MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - FNGD tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index (-300%) while SOXL tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNGD returned -62.47%/yr vs 42.16%/yr for SOXL. At a correlation of -0.75, they often move in opposite directions. FNGD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
FNGD vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGD achieves a -27.13% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 450.61% return.
FNGD
- 1D
- 7.44%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- -27.13%
- 6M
- -23.35%
- 1Y
- -49.41%
- 3Y*
- -65.49%
- 5Y*
- -62.47%
- 10Y*
- —
SOXL
- 1D
- -23.06%
- 1M
- 21.44%
- YTD
- 450.61%
- 6M
- 429.57%
- 1Y
- 976.09%
- 3Y*
- 120.84%
- 5Y*
- 42.16%
- 10Y*
- 64.56%
FNGD vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -27.13% | -61.42% | -76.57% | -90.14% | 52.21% | -60.04% | -95.60% | -72.46% | -16.61% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 450.61% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 70.04% | 231.83% | -54.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGD and SOXL is -0.60, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2018 | -0.75 |
The correlation between FNGD and SOXL shifts across timeframes, from -0.76 (5 years) to -0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FNGD vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNGD
SOXL
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FNGD
SOXL
Communication Services
FNGD
SOXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
FNGD
SOXL
-
Financial Services
FNGD
SOXL
-
Basic Materials
FNGD
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Defensive
FNGD
-
SOXL
-
Energy
FNGD
-
SOXL
-
Healthcare
FNGD
-
SOXL
-
Industrials
FNGD
-
SOXL
-
Real Estate
FNGD
-
SOXL
-
Utilities
FNGD
-
SOXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGD vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
FNGD
SOXL
FNGD vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNGD | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.58 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 22.69 | -23.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | 72.83 | -74.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNGD vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGD drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SOXL's maximum drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGD and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGD | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -90.46% | -9.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.92% | -43.47% | -22.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.35% | -87.88% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.67% | -90.46% | -9.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -23.06% | -76.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.30% | -34.95% | -52.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.15% | 13.52% | +20.63% |
Volatility
FNGD vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) is 33.07%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 68.39%. This indicates that FNGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGD | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.07% | 68.39% | -35.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.22% | 99.84% | -46.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.50% | 116.79% | -51.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.67% | 110.35% | -20.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.30% | 100.62% | -9.32% |
FNGD vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNGD vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
FNGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGD and SOXL have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (68.39%) compared to FNGD (33.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGD dropped -100.00% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 5-year performance, SOXL leads with 42.16% vs -62.47% for FNGD. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FNGD has been the lower-risk option at 33.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 42.16% return vs -62.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FNGD.
SOXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for FNGD.
FNGD tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (-300%), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FNGD and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.45 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNGD and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer