FNGD vs. NTSD
FNGD (MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FNGD is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.76, they often move in opposite directions. FNGD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
FNGD vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FNGD
- 1D
- 7.44%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- -27.13%
- 6M
- -23.35%
- 1Y
- -49.41%
- 3Y*
- -65.49%
- 5Y*
- -62.47%
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNGD vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -41.01% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 15.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGD and NTSD is -0.76, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | -0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGD vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
FNGD
NTSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FNGD vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNGD | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNGD vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGD drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGD and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGD | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -5.58% | -94.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -2.97% | -97.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.30% | -1.09% | -86.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.15% | — | — |
Volatility
FNGD vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGD | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.50% | 25.11% | +40.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.67% | 25.11% | +64.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.30% | 25.11% | +66.19% |
FNGD vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNGD vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither FNGD nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGD and NTSD have a correlation of -0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FNGD.
FNGD and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FNGD and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for FNGD and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer