FNDX vs. LSVD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) and LSVD (LSV Disciplined Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FNDX is passively managed, while LSVD is actively managed. Over the past year, FNDX returned 30.33% vs 37.36% for LSVD. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LSVD.

Performance

FNDX vs. LSVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FNDX having a 14.31% return and LSVD slightly higher at 14.66%.

FNDX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 14.31%
• 6M: 13.73%
• 1Y: 30.33%
• 3Y*: 20.33%
• 5Y*: 13.24%
• 10Y*: 14.48%

LSVD

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: -0.36%
• YTD: 14.66%
• 6M: 13.72%
• 1Y: 37.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDX vs. LSVD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	14.31%	16.94%	-2.19%
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	14.66%	22.29%	-2.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDX and LSVD is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024	0.86

The correlation between FNDX and LSVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDX vs. LSVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDX	LSVD
Technology	22.1%	38.9%
Financial Services	13.3%	11.5%
Healthcare	11.9%	11.2%
Communication Services	9.9%	14.3%
Energy	9.3%	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	11.6%
Industrials	9.1%	4.4%
Consumer Defensive	7.0%	2.8%
Basic Materials	3.6%	1.5%
Utilities	3.0%	0.8%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.2%

Return for Risk

FNDX vs. LSVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDX

FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

LSVD

LSVD Risk / Return Rank: 90
LSVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
LSVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
LSVD Omega Ratio Rank: 88
LSVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
LSVD Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDX vs. LSVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNDX	LSVD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.92	2.84	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.05	3.83	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.50	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.02	4.65	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.42	20.34	-0.92

FNDX vs. LSVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the LSVD Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDX and LSVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNDX vs. LSVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, which is greater than LSVD's maximum drawdown of -19.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and LSVD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDX	LSVD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.72%	-19.30%	-18.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.06%	-8.07%	+2.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	-3.22%	+1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.55%	-2.49%	-1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	1.84%	-0.27%

Volatility

FNDX vs. LSVD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) is 3.33%, while LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that FNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDX	LSVD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	4.77%	-1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.63%	10.27%	-2.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.47%	13.23%	-2.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.18%	17.64%	-2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.48%	17.64%	-0.16%

FNDX vs. LSVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LSVD's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNDX vs. LSVD - Dividend Comparison

FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than LSVD's 0.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	1.45%	1.63%	1.76%	1.82%	2.07%	1.64%	2.29%	2.23%	2.40%	1.86%	2.01%	2.01%
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	0.28%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDX and LSVD in my portfolio?

FNDX and LSVD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDX or LSVD?

LSVD has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to FNDX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDX dropped -37.72% vs LSVD's -19.30%.

Which ETF is better, FNDX or LSVD?

On 1-year performance, LSVD leads with 37.36% vs 30.33% for FNDX. On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDX or LSVD?

Over the 1-year period, LSVD has performed better with a 37.36% return vs 30.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDX or LSVD?

FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LSVD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDX or LSVD?

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.28% for LSVD.

What is the main difference between FNDX and LSVD?

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and LSV. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDX and 0.40% for LSVD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.