FNDX vs. FMAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Fidelity Magellan Fund (FMAGX).
FNDX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. FMAGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 2, 1963.
Performance
FNDX vs. FMAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNDX vs. FMAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 2.98% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 18.23% | -6.92% | 31.73% | 9.12% | 28.65% | -7.30% | 17.12% |
FMAGX Fidelity Magellan Fund | -7.56% | 16.27% | 28.06% | 31.04% | -27.18% | 27.08% | 28.34% | 31.26% | -5.70% | 26.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 2.98% return, which is significantly higher than FMAGX's -7.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNDX having a 13.29% annualized return and FMAGX not far ahead at 13.59%.
FNDX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- 2.98%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- 1Y
- 20.25%
- 3Y*
- 17.20%
- 5Y*
- 12.04%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
FMAGX
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -7.56%
- 6M
- -10.07%
- 1Y
- 13.29%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDX vs. FMAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAGX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FNDX vs. FMAGX — Risk / Return Rank
FNDX
FMAGX
FNDX vs. FMAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Fidelity Magellan Fund (FMAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDX | FMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 0.69 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 1.16 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.16 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 1.02 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.91 | 3.62 | +4.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDX | FMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 0.69 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.52 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.68 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.55 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDX and FMAGX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FNDX vs. FMAGX - Dividend Comparison
FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than FMAGX's 15.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.61% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
FMAGX Fidelity Magellan Fund | 15.04% | 13.90% | 6.12% | 11.72% | 5.02% | 7.01% | 0.30% | 14.93% | 10.83% | 9.64% | 2.92% | 7.60% |
Drawdowns
FNDX vs. FMAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, smaller than the maximum FMAGX drawdown of -71.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and FMAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDX | FMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.72% | -71.14% | +33.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.25% | -14.00% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.06% | -33.13% | +14.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.72% | -33.13% | -4.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.00% | -11.17% | +7.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.59% | -15.00% | +11.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 3.94% | -1.38% |
Volatility
FNDX vs. FMAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) is 3.84%, while Fidelity Magellan Fund (FMAGX) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that FNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNDX | FMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 6.25% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.06% | 11.13% | -3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.18% | 20.63% | -4.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.26% | 20.06% | -4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 20.10% | -2.59% |