FNDX vs. EBND

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) and EBND (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index, while EBND is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Emerging Market Local Currency Government Diversified. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDX returned 14.16%/yr vs 1.53%/yr for EBND. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FNDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EBND.

Performance

FNDX vs. EBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly higher than EBND's -1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDX has outperformed EBND with an annualized return of 14.16%, while EBND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.53% annualized return.

FNDX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.45%
• YTD: 13.72%
• 6M: 14.45%
• 1Y: 30.74%
• 3Y*: 20.18%
• 5Y*: 12.71%
• 10Y*: 14.16%

EBND

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: -1.26%
• 6M: 0.11%
• 1Y: 4.49%
• 3Y*: 4.91%
• 5Y*: -0.18%
• 10Y*: 1.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDX vs. EBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	13.72%	16.94%	16.77%	18.23%	-6.92%	31.73%	9.12%	28.65%	-7.30%	17.12%
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF	-1.26%	15.83%	-2.70%	9.02%	-11.84%	-9.66%	4.49%	10.40%	-6.52%	13.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDX and EBND is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.42

The correlation between FNDX and EBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FNDX vs. EBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDX

FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 91
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

EBND

EBND Risk / Return Rank: 20
EBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
EBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
EBND Omega Ratio Rank: 21
EBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
EBND Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDX vs. EBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNDX	EBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.00	0.64	+2.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.15	0.93	+3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.13	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.09	0.68	+4.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.86	2.22	+17.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNDX vs. EBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the EBND Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDX and EBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNDX	EBND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.00	0.64	+2.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	-0.02	+0.86
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.17	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.10	+0.69

Drawdowns

FNDX vs. EBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, which is greater than EBND's maximum drawdown of -29.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and EBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDX	EBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.72%	-29.51%	-8.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.06%	-6.63%	+0.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.30%	-9.25%	-7.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.06%	-27.57%	+8.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.72%	-29.50%	-8.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	-4.24%	+2.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.55%	-10.86%	+7.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.55%	2.02%	-0.47%

Volatility

FNDX vs. EBND - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) at 2.45%. This indicates that FNDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDX	EBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	2.45%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.46%	6.07%	+1.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.32%	7.03%	+3.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.20%	8.99%	+6.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.51%	9.19%	+8.32%

FNDX vs. EBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EBND's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNDX vs. EBND - Dividend Comparison

FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than EBND's 5.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF	5.89%	5.54%	5.89%	5.26%	4.75%	3.83%	3.67%	4.68%	4.70%	2.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	1.46%	1.63%	1.76%	1.82%	2.07%	1.64%	2.29%	2.23%	2.40%	1.86%	2.01%	2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDX and EBND in my portfolio?

FNDX and EBND have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDX or EBND?

FNDX has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to EBND (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDX dropped -37.72% vs EBND's -29.51%.

Which ETF is better, FNDX or EBND?

On 10-year performance, FNDX leads with 14.16% vs 1.53% for EBND. On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EBND has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDX or EBND?

Over the 10-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 14.16% return vs 1.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDX or EBND?

FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDX or EBND?

EBND has the higher dividend yield at 5.89%, compared with 1.46% for FNDX.

What is the main difference between FNDX and EBND?

FNDX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while EBND is Emerging Markets Bonds. FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index, while EBND tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Local Currency Government Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDX and 0.30% for EBND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.