FNDX vs. AVEM
FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) and AVEM (Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index, while AVEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. FNDX is passively managed, while AVEM is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNDX returned 12.91%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for AVEM. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for AVEM.
Performance
FNDX vs. AVEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 14.46% return, which is significantly lower than AVEM's 24.56% return.
FNDX
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 14.46%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- 1Y
- 30.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
AVEM
- 1D
- 4.59%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 24.56%
- 6M
- 25.81%
- 1Y
- 45.40%
- 3Y*
- 24.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.57%
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX vs. AVEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 14.46% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 18.23% | -6.92% | 31.73% | 9.12% | 7.95% |
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 24.56% | 34.48% | 7.49% | 15.30% | -18.15% | 5.16% | 14.39% | 10.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDX and AVEM is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2019 | 0.64 |
The correlation between FNDX and AVEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNDX vs. AVEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNDX
AVEM
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FNDX
AVEM
Financial Services
FNDX
AVEM
Healthcare
FNDX
AVEM
Energy
FNDX
AVEM
Communication Services
FNDX
AVEM
Industrials
FNDX
AVEM
Consumer Cyclical
FNDX
AVEM
Consumer Defensive
FNDX
AVEM
Basic Materials
FNDX
AVEM
Utilities
FNDX
AVEM
Real Estate
FNDX
AVEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDX vs. AVEM — Risk / Return Rank
FNDX
AVEM
FNDX vs. AVEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDX | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.40 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.09 | 3.47 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.73 | 13.23 | +6.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDX vs. AVEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, roughly equal to the maximum AVEM drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and AVEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDX | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.72% | -36.05% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.06% | -13.13% | +7.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.30% | -18.02% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.06% | -33.88% | +14.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -3.73% | +2.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -10.08% | +6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 3.44% | -1.88% |
Volatility
FNDX vs. AVEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) is 3.07%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) has a volatility of 11.06%. This indicates that FNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDX | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 11.06% | -7.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.63% | 18.80% | -11.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.42% | 21.17% | -10.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 18.71% | -3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 20.77% | -3.26% |
FNDX vs. AVEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AVEM's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNDX vs. AVEM - Dividend Comparison
FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than AVEM's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.60% | 2.45% | 3.17% | 3.06% | 2.77% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDX and AVEM have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVEM has higher volatility (11.06%) compared to FNDX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDX dropped -37.72% vs AVEM's -36.05%.
On 5-year performance, FNDX leads with 12.91% vs 9.57% for AVEM. On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 9.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AVEM.
AVEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.45% for FNDX.
FNDX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while AVEM is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDX and 0.33% for AVEM.
FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDX and AVEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer