FNDSX vs. VTBNX
FNDSX (Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund) and VTBNX (Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund) are both Total Bond Market funds. Over the past 5 years, FNDSX returned -0.59%/yr vs -0.44%/yr for VTBNX. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FNDSX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for VTBNX.
Performance
FNDSX vs. VTBNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDSX achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly higher than VTBNX's -0.71% return.
FNDSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- 6M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- 1.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.57%
- 5Y*
- -0.59%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.57%
VTBNX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 1.70%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- -0.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FNDSX vs. VTBNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDSX Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund | -0.66% | 7.03% | 1.23% | 5.44% | -13.34% | -2.22% | 6.95% | 8.30% | 1.89% |
VTBNX Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund | -0.71% | 7.18% | 1.32% | 5.68% | -13.12% | -1.82% | 7.39% | 8.71% | 2.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDSX and VTBNX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.97 |
The correlation between FNDSX and VTBNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDSX vs. VTBNX — Risk / Return Rank
FNDSX
VTBNX
FNDSX vs. VTBNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDSX | VTBNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.03 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.44 | 2.56 | -0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDSX vs. VTBNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDSX drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, which is greater than VTBNX's maximum drawdown of -18.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDSX and VTBNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDSX | VTBNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -18.71% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -2.83% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.10% | -4.92% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.30% | -17.98% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.78% | -3.22% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -4.83% | -1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 1.14% | +0.05% |
Volatility
FNDSX vs. VTBNX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX) have volatilities of 0.99% and 1.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDSX | VTBNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | 1.00% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.02% | 2.96% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 3.81% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.01% | 5.96% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.28% | 4.93% | +0.35% |
FNDSX vs. VTBNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDSX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTBNX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FNDSX vs. VTBNX - Dividend Comparison
FNDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than VTBNX's 3.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDSX Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund | 3.70% | 3.84% | 3.53% | 2.84% | 1.55% | 1.17% | 1.79% | 3.17% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTBNX Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund | 3.78% | 3.95% | 3.77% | 3.13% | 2.54% | 1.82% | 3.12% | 2.79% | 2.56% | 2.52% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, FNDSX and VTBNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTBNX has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to FNDSX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDSX dropped -19.72% vs VTBNX's -18.71%.
VTBNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDSX and VTBNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer