PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDSX vs. VTBNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDSX vs. VTBNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDSX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than VTBNX's 0.01% return.


FNDSX

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.42%
1Y
4.12%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*

VTBNX

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.01%
6M
0.45%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
1.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDSX vs. VTBNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FNDSX
Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund
0.10%7.03%1.23%5.44%-13.34%-2.22%6.95%8.30%1.89%
VTBNX
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund
0.01%7.18%1.32%5.68%-13.12%-1.82%7.39%8.71%2.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDSX and VTBNX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018

0.97

The correlation between FNDSX and VTBNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDSX vs. VTBNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDSX
FNDSX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FNDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VTBNX
VTBNX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VTBNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTBNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTBNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VTBNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTBNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDSX vs. VTBNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDSXVTBNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.19

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

1.54

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.17

4.30

-0.13

FNDSX vs. VTBNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the VTBNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDSX and VTBNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDSX vs. VTBNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDSX drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, which is greater than VTBNX's maximum drawdown of -18.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDSX and VTBNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDSXVTBNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-18.71%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-2.83%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-5.97%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.30%

-18.05%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.06%

-2.52%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-4.86%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

1.01%

+0.03%

Volatility

FNDSX vs. VTBNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX) at 1.13%. This indicates that FNDSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTBNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDSXVTBNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

1.13%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

2.86%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

3.88%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

5.96%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.30%

4.93%

+0.37%

FNDSX vs. VTBNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDSX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTBNX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNDSX vs. VTBNX - Dividend Comparison

FNDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than VTBNX's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FNDSX
Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund
3.97%3.84%3.53%2.84%1.55%1.17%1.79%3.17%1.56%0.00%0.00%
VTBNX
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund
4.07%3.95%3.77%3.13%2.54%1.82%3.12%2.79%2.56%2.52%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FNDSX and VTBNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNDSX has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to VTBNX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDSX dropped -19.72% vs VTBNX's -18.71%.

VTBNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDSX and VTBNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer