PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDSX vs. FTHRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDSX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDSX achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly higher than FTHRX's 0.15% return.


FNDSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.31%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*

FTHRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.15%
6M
0.22%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*
2.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDSX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FNDSX
Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund
0.42%7.03%1.23%5.44%-13.34%-2.22%6.95%8.30%1.89%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
0.15%6.89%3.25%5.55%-9.17%-1.60%7.06%7.20%1.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDSX and FTHRX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2018

0.92

The correlation between FNDSX and FTHRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDSX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDSX
FNDSX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FNDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FTHRX
FTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDSX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNDSXFTHRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

1.92

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.39

5.74

-0.35

FNDSX vs. FTHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the FTHRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDSX and FTHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNDSXFTHRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.44

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.27

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.91

-0.58

Drawdowns

FNDSX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDSX drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, roughly equal to the maximum FTHRX drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDSX and FTHRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDSXFTHRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-19.01%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-2.11%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-2.68%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.30%

-13.18%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.74%

-1.09%

-2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-3.07%

-3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

0.70%

+0.28%

Volatility

FNDSX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) at 0.91%. This indicates that FNDSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDSXFTHRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

0.91%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

2.02%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

2.81%

+1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

4.03%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.31%

3.40%

+1.91%

FNDSX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDSX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FTHRX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDSX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison

FNDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than FTHRX's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDSX
Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund
3.95%3.84%3.53%2.84%1.55%1.17%1.79%3.17%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
3.69%3.59%3.49%2.94%1.55%1.53%4.16%2.49%2.48%2.20%2.63%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FNDSX and FTHRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNDSX has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to FTHRX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDSX dropped -19.72% vs FTHRX's -19.01%.

FTHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDSX and FTHRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer