PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDSX vs. FANCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDSX vs. FANCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) and Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C (FANCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDSX achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than FANCX's -0.01% return.


FNDSX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.29%
6M
-0.98%
YTD
-0.66%
1Y
1.68%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
-0.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.57%

FANCX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.24%
6M
-0.14%
YTD
-0.01%
1Y
1.50%
3Y*
3.49%
5Y*
1.16%
10Y*
1.03%
ALL TIME*
1.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FNDSX vs. FANCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FNDSX
Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund
-0.66%7.03%1.23%5.44%-13.34%-2.22%6.95%8.30%1.89%
FANCX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C
-0.01%4.38%3.74%3.91%-4.63%-1.81%2.74%2.90%0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDSX and FANCX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018

0.72

The correlation between FNDSX and FANCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDSX vs. FANCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNDSX
FNDSX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FNDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FANCX
FANCX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FANCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FANCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FANCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FANCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FANCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNDSX vs. FANCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) and Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C (FANCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDSXFANCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.28

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

1.93

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.44

5.41

-2.97

FNDSX vs. FANCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the FANCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDSX and FANCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDSX vs. FANCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDSX drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, which is greater than FANCX's maximum drawdown of -7.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDSX and FANCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDSXFANCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-7.79%

-11.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-1.18%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.10%

-1.18%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.30%

-7.24%

-11.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.78%

-0.58%

-4.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.44%

-1.54%

-4.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

0.42%

+0.77%

Volatility

FNDSX vs. FANCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) has a higher volatility of 0.99% compared to Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C (FANCX) at 0.38%. This indicates that FNDSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FANCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDSXFANCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

0.38%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

1.38%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

1.82%

+2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

2.14%

+3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.28%

1.77%

+3.51%

FNDSX vs. FANCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDSX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FANCX's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDSX vs. FANCX - Dividend Comparison

FNDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than FANCX's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FANCX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C
2.82%3.20%2.95%1.75%0.15%0.36%1.68%1.00%0.69%0.21%0.07%
FNDSX
Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund
3.70%3.84%3.53%2.84%1.55%1.17%1.79%3.17%1.56%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDSX and FANCX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDSX has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to FANCX (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDSX dropped -19.72% vs FANCX's -7.79%.

FANCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDSX and FANCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer