PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDE vs. UEVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDE vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 13.42% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 6.55% return.


FNDE

1D
1.14%
1M
-0.10%
6M
8.60%
YTD
13.42%
1Y
25.03%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
9.95%
ALL TIME*
7.09%

UEVM

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.02%
6M
1.58%
YTD
6.55%
1Y
14.13%
3Y*
15.89%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDE vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
13.42%29.46%12.10%14.99%-15.58%14.41%-2.77%19.75%-10.37%3.54%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
6.55%22.74%11.92%17.41%-14.60%11.09%3.77%10.71%-16.96%3.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and UEVM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.92

The correlation between FNDE and UEVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDE vs. UEVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDE
UEVM

Financial Services

25.0%
26.6%

Technology

22.3%
9.1%

Energy

13.2%
5.8%

Basic Materials

12.0%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
10.7%

Communication Services

6.6%
2.0%

Industrials

4.6%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
10.2%

Utilities

2.4%
5.0%

Real Estate

1.4%
4.6%

Healthcare

0.4%
8.8%

Financial Services

FNDE
25.0%
UEVM
26.6%

Technology

FNDE
22.3%
UEVM
9.1%

Energy

FNDE
13.2%
UEVM
5.8%

Basic Materials

FNDE
12.0%
UEVM
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDE
8.9%
UEVM
10.7%

Communication Services

FNDE
6.6%
UEVM
2.0%

Industrials

FNDE
4.6%
UEVM
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

FNDE
3.3%
UEVM
10.2%

Utilities

FNDE
2.4%
UEVM
5.0%

Real Estate

FNDE
1.4%
UEVM
4.6%

Healthcare

FNDE
0.4%
UEVM
8.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDE vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDE vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDEUEVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.17

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

1.45

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.87

4.25

+3.61

FNDE vs. UEVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the UEVM Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and UEVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, roughly equal to the maximum UEVM drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and UEVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDEUEVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.55%

-45.44%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-9.79%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-18.88%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-26.55%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.42%

-4.37%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-11.56%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

3.33%

-0.14%

Volatility

FNDE vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) at 4.28%. This indicates that FNDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDEUEVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

4.28%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.63%

13.22%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

15.84%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

16.07%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.13%

18.38%

+0.75%

FNDE vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDE vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than UEVM's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.65%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
2.72%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FNDE and UEVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNDE has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to UEVM (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs UEVM's -45.44%.

On 5-year performance, FNDE leads with 10.36% vs 7.89% for UEVM. On fees, FNDE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 10.36% return vs 7.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.

FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 2.72% for UEVM.

FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while UEVM is Momentum. FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net), while UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.45% for UEVM.

FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDE and UEVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer