PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDE vs. TJUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDE vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly higher than TJUN's 5.26% return.


FNDE

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.39%
YTD
15.11%
6M
15.70%
1Y
35.50%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
11.11%

TJUN

1D
0.00%
1M
0.51%
YTD
5.26%
6M
6.88%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDE vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and TJUN is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.82

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDE vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

TJUN
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDE vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNDETJUNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.19

FNDE vs. TJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNDETJUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

2.48

-2.10

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and TJUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDETJUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.55%

-4.47%

-39.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

0.00%

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.71%

-0.59%

-11.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

Volatility

FNDE vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDETJUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

7.52%

+7.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

7.52%

+9.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.30%

7.52%

+11.78%

FNDE vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDE vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
3.64%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%
TJUN
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDE and TJUN have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FNDE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FNDE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.

FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.

FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.95% for TJUN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDE and TJUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer