FNDE vs. QAT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FNDE (Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and QAT (iShares MSCI Qatar ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - FNDE tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net) while QAT tracks the MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDE returned 11.02%/yr vs 4.43%/yr for QAT. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FNDE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for QAT.

Performance

FNDE vs. QAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly higher than QAT's 1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDE has outperformed QAT with an annualized return of 11.02%, while QAT has yielded a comparatively lower 4.43% annualized return.

FNDE

• 1D: -2.50%
• 1M: -0.84%
• YTD: 11.56%
• 6M: 11.69%
• 1Y: 29.54%
• 3Y*: 19.89%
• 5Y*: 9.15%
• 10Y*: 11.02%

QAT

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 2.08%
• YTD: 1.01%
• 6M: 0.41%
• 1Y: 7.11%
• 3Y*: 5.84%
• 5Y*: 3.56%
• 10Y*: 4.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDE vs. QAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF	11.56%	29.46%	12.10%	14.99%	-15.58%	14.41%	-2.77%	19.75%	-10.37%	26.77%
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF	1.01%	8.81%	5.20%	2.72%	-7.23%	14.42%	6.94%	-0.44%	20.03%	-11.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and QAT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2014	0.34

FNDE vs. QAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDE	QAT
Technology	22.3%	1.0%
Financial Services	16.8%	55.5%
Energy	10.6%	7.6%
Basic Materials	8.0%	12.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	0.7%
Communication Services	3.6%	6.3%
Industrials	3.5%	8.4%
Utilities	1.9%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.5%	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	0.6%
Healthcare	1.1%	0.8%

Return for Risk

FNDE vs. QAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDE

FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 59
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 61

QAT

QAT Risk / Return Rank: 17
QAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
QAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
QAT Omega Ratio Rank: 17
QAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
QAT Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDE vs. QAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNDE	QAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	0.54	+1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	0.87	+1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.11	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	0.67	+2.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.42	1.24	+9.18

FNDE vs. QAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the QAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and QAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. QAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, roughly equal to the maximum QAT drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and QAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDE	QAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.55%	-45.21%	+1.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.23%	-10.60%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.40%	-17.41%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.44%	-33.17%	+3.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.93%	-34.04%	-5.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.01%	-11.55%	+6.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.67%	-19.14%	+7.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	5.75%	-2.91%

Volatility

FNDE vs. QAT - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) at 5.72%. This indicates that FNDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDE	QAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.66%	5.72%	+0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.44%	11.06%	+2.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.83%	13.25%	+2.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.07%	15.06%	+2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.20%	17.54%	+1.66%

FNDE vs. QAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than QAT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNDE vs. QAT - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than QAT's 4.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF	3.75%	4.19%	4.82%	4.74%	5.59%	4.32%	2.50%	3.47%	2.98%	2.05%	1.65%	2.02%
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF	4.63%	3.51%	5.90%	3.92%	4.78%	2.33%	2.63%	3.57%	4.63%	4.10%	3.51%	4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDE and QAT in my portfolio?

FNDE and QAT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDE or QAT?

FNDE has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to QAT (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs QAT's -45.21%.

Which ETF is better, FNDE or QAT?

On 10-year performance, FNDE leads with 11.02% vs 4.43% for QAT. On fees, FNDE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, QAT has been the lower-risk option at 5.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDE or QAT?

Over the 10-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 11.02% return vs 4.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDE or QAT?

FNDE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for QAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDE or QAT?

QAT has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 3.75% for FNDE.

What is the main difference between FNDE and QAT?

FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net), while QAT tracks MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.59% for QAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.