FNDE vs. EMMF
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF).
FNDE and EMMF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDE is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. EMMF is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Aug 10, 2018.
Performance
FNDE vs. EMMF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNDE vs. EMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF | 6.10% | 29.46% | 12.10% | 14.99% | -15.58% | 14.41% | -2.77% | 19.75% | -4.85% |
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 5.23% | 21.22% | 9.45% | 20.59% | -13.47% | 5.97% | 9.25% | 2.30% | -6.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 6.10% return, which is significantly higher than EMMF's 5.23% return.
FNDE
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- -5.06%
- YTD
- 6.10%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 29.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
EMMF
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDE vs. EMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EMMF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FNDE vs. EMMF — Risk / Return Rank
FNDE
EMMF
FNDE vs. EMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDE | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.66 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | 2.25 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 2.58 | -0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.71 | 10.52 | -0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDE | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.66 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.53 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.39 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDE and EMMF is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FNDE vs. EMMF - Dividend Comparison
FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than EMMF's 2.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF | 3.94% | 4.19% | 4.82% | 4.74% | 5.59% | 4.32% | 2.50% | 3.47% | 2.98% | 2.05% | 1.65% | 2.02% |
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 2.25% | 2.45% | 1.30% | 1.62% | 3.48% | 2.64% | 1.93% | 2.93% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FNDE vs. EMMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, which is greater than EMMF's maximum drawdown of -32.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and EMMF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDE | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.55% | -32.57% | -10.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.72% | -10.62% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | -25.20% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.41% | -7.68% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.84% | -7.58% | -4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 2.61% | +0.45% |
Volatility
FNDE vs. EMMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) is 7.66%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) has a volatility of 9.11%. This indicates that FNDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNDE | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.66% | 9.11% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.93% | 12.48% | -0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.79% | 16.91% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 14.01% | +2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.41% | 16.45% | +2.96% |