FNDE vs. EMIF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF).

FNDE and EMIF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDE is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. EMIF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2009. Both FNDE and EMIF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FNDE vs. EMIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FNDE vs. EMIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF	6.10%	29.46%	12.10%	14.99%	-15.58%	14.41%	-2.77%	19.75%	-10.37%	26.77%
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF	6.16%	33.90%	1.21%	5.67%	-12.59%	3.76%	-19.98%	16.36%	-13.70%	20.70%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FNDE having a 6.10% return and EMIF slightly higher at 6.16%. Over the past 10 years, FNDE has outperformed EMIF with an annualized return of 10.24%, while EMIF has yielded a comparatively lower 2.68% annualized return.

FNDE

• 1D: 2.71%
• 1M: -5.06%
• YTD: 6.10%
• 6M: 9.65%
• 1Y: 29.56%
• 3Y*: 18.98%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: 10.24%

EMIF

• 1D: 1.91%
• 1M: -8.08%
• YTD: 6.16%
• 6M: 12.77%
• 1Y: 39.99%
• 3Y*: 13.95%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: 2.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDE vs. EMIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EMIF's 0.75% expense ratio.

EMIF

iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF

FNDE

Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF

Return for Risk

FNDE vs. EMIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDE

FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 85
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 86

EMIF

EMIF Risk / Return Rank: 95
EMIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EMIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EMIF Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EMIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EMIF Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDE vs. EMIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNDE	EMIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	2.41	-0.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	3.15	-0.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.47	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	3.78	-1.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.71	13.68	-3.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNDE vs. EMIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the EMIF Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and EMIF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNDE	EMIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	2.41	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.33	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.13	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.18	+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and EMIF is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FNDE vs. EMIF - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than EMIF's 4.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF	3.94%	4.19%	4.82%	4.74%	5.59%	4.32%	2.50%	3.47%	2.98%	2.05%	1.65%	2.02%
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF	4.67%	4.96%	4.12%	2.64%	3.08%	3.94%	2.54%	2.07%	2.64%	2.58%	3.16%	2.07%

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. EMIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, smaller than the maximum EMIF drawdown of -48.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and EMIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDE	EMIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.55%	-48.02%	+4.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.72%	-10.49%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.44%	-23.68%	-5.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.93%	-48.02%	+8.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.41%	-8.65%	+2.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.84%	-16.00%	+4.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	2.89%	+0.17%

Volatility

FNDE vs. EMIF - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) have volatilities of 7.66% and 7.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDE	EMIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.66%	7.64%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.93%	12.00%	-0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.79%	16.67%	+1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.87%	19.63%	-2.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.41%	20.61%	-1.20%