PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDE vs. DFEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDE vs. DFEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly lower than DFEV's 22.81% return.


FNDE

1D
0.45%
1M
-3.22%
YTD
11.54%
6M
12.71%
1Y
30.40%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
10.89%

DFEV

1D
1.62%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
22.81%
6M
25.32%
1Y
46.17%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDE vs. DFEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
11.54%29.46%12.10%14.99%-4.06%
DFEV
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF
22.81%32.54%7.26%15.52%-6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and DFEV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022

0.94

The correlation between FNDE and DFEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDE vs. DFEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDE
DFEV

Financial Services

23.8%
16.8%

Technology

18.7%
28.6%

Energy

15.5%
7.6%

Basic Materials

13.6%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
10.5%

Communication Services

6.6%
3.5%

Industrials

4.7%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
3.4%

Utilities

2.5%
0.8%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.6%

Healthcare

0.5%
3.3%

Financial Services

FNDE
23.8%
DFEV
16.8%

Technology

FNDE
18.7%
DFEV
28.6%

Energy

FNDE
15.5%
DFEV
7.6%

Basic Materials

FNDE
13.6%
DFEV
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDE
9.5%
DFEV
10.5%

Communication Services

FNDE
6.6%
DFEV
3.5%

Industrials

FNDE
4.7%
DFEV
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

FNDE
3.1%
DFEV
3.4%

Utilities

FNDE
2.5%
DFEV
0.8%

Real Estate

FNDE
1.5%
DFEV
1.6%

Healthcare

FNDE
0.5%
DFEV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDE vs. DFEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

DFEV
DFEV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DFEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDE vs. DFEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNDEDFEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.47

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

4.09

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.12

15.04

-3.92

FNDE vs. DFEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the DFEV Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and DFEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNDEDFEVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.52

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

1.00

-0.64

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. DFEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, which is greater than DFEV's maximum drawdown of -18.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and DFEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDEDFEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.55%

-18.49%

-25.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-11.35%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-17.94%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.03%

-6.42%

+1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.70%

-4.65%

-7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

3.08%

-0.34%

Volatility

FNDE vs. DFEV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) is 5.93%, while Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) has a volatility of 9.67%. This indicates that FNDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDEDFEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.93%

9.67%

-3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

16.20%

-3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.47%

18.42%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

16.68%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

16.68%

+2.64%

FNDE vs. DFEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DFEV's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDE vs. DFEV - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than DFEV's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFEV
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF
2.13%2.69%3.17%3.47%3.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
3.75%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FNDE and DFEV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFEV has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to FNDE (5.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs DFEV's -18.49%.

On 3-year performance, DFEV leads with 22.74% vs 19.28% for FNDE. On fees, FNDE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FNDE has been the lower-risk option at 5.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFEV has performed better with a 22.74% return vs 19.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for DFEV.

FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 2.13% for DFEV.

FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DFEV is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.43% for DFEV.

DFEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDE and DFEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer