PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDE vs. BNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDE vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than BNDX's 1.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDE has outperformed BNDX with an annualized return of 10.87%, while BNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.77% annualized return.


FNDE

1D
-1.37%
1M
-2.19%
YTD
10.04%
6M
10.13%
1Y
25.37%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
10.87%

BNDX

1D
0.25%
1M
1.15%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1.31%
1Y
2.46%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
1.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDE vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
10.04%29.46%12.10%14.99%-15.58%14.41%-2.77%19.75%-10.37%26.77%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
1.52%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and BNDX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.00

Over the past year, FNDE and BNDX have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.00, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDE vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDE vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDEBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.13

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

0.84

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

2.33

+6.53

FNDE vs. BNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the BNDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and BNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and BNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDEBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.55%

-16.23%

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-2.93%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-2.93%

-15.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-15.86%

-13.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

-16.23%

-23.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.30%

-0.52%

-5.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.67%

-3.10%

-8.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

1.06%

+1.81%

Volatility

FNDE vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 0.98%. This indicates that FNDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDEBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.78%

0.98%

+5.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

2.98%

+10.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

3.46%

+12.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

4.89%

+12.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.21%

4.09%

+15.12%

FNDE vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDE vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than BNDX's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.45%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.80%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDE and BNDX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDE has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to BNDX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs BNDX's -16.23%.

On 10-year performance, FNDE leads with 10.87% vs 1.77% for BNDX. On fees, BNDX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BNDX has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 10.87% return vs 1.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNDX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDE.

BNDX has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 3.80% for FNDE.

FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while BNDX is Global Bonds. FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net), while BNDX tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.07% for BNDX.

FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDE and BNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer