PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNCMX vs. VIGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNCMX vs. VIGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) and Vanguard Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VIGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCMX achieves a 15.79% return, which is significantly higher than VIGIX's 9.47% return. Over the past 10 years, FNCMX has outperformed VIGIX with an annualized return of 19.34%, while VIGIX has yielded a comparatively lower 18.25% annualized return.


FNCMX

1D
-0.88%
1M
6.11%
YTD
15.79%
6M
14.55%
1Y
38.83%
3Y*
27.53%
5Y*
15.16%
10Y*
19.34%

VIGIX

1D
-1.23%
1M
5.47%
YTD
9.47%
6M
8.60%
1Y
27.36%
3Y*
25.95%
5Y*
15.10%
10Y*
18.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNCMX vs. VIGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNCMX
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund
15.79%21.11%29.48%45.13%-32.40%22.21%44.57%36.63%-3.07%28.35%
VIGIX
Vanguard Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
9.47%19.44%32.68%46.77%-33.13%27.27%40.19%37.26%-3.34%27.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FNCMX and VIGIX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2003

0.95

The correlation between FNCMX and VIGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNCMX vs. VIGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCMX
FNCMX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FNCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

VIGIX
VIGIX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VIGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
VIGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCMX vs. VIGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) and Vanguard Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VIGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNCMXVIGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.31

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

1.70

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.93

5.96

+5.96

FNCMX vs. VIGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the VIGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCMX and VIGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNCMXVIGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

1.76

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.68

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.85

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.47

+0.11

Drawdowns

FNCMX vs. VIGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCMX drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, roughly equal to the maximum VIGIX drawdown of -56.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCMX and VIGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNCMXVIGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.08%

-56.95%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.01%

-16.51%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.20%

-23.03%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.64%

-35.62%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.64%

-35.62%

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-1.51%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.86%

-16.27%

+8.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

4.68%

-1.38%

Volatility

FNCMX vs. VIGIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Vanguard Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VIGIX) at 3.92%. This indicates that FNCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNCMXVIGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

3.92%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.14%

12.17%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.25%

15.92%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.46%

22.35%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.05%

21.59%

+0.46%

FNCMX vs. VIGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCMX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VIGIX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNCMX vs. VIGIX - Dividend Comparison

FNCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, more than VIGIX's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNCMX
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund
0.44%0.51%0.61%0.67%0.88%0.47%0.67%4.41%1.93%0.03%1.01%1.50%
VIGIX
Vanguard Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.15%1.40%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FNCMX and VIGIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNCMX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to VIGIX (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNCMX dropped -55.08% vs VIGIX's -56.95%.

FNCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNCMX and VIGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer