PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNCE.L vs. XWFS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNCE.L vs. XWFS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FNCE.L vs. XWFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FNCE.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF
-6.48%54.52%20.29%18.87%5.67%
XWFS.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C
-6.55%20.20%29.08%10.02%-0.12%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FNCE.L having a -6.48% return and XWFS.L slightly lower at -6.55%.


FNCE.L

1D
1.54%
1M
-8.66%
YTD
-6.48%
6M
3.03%
1Y
22.86%
3Y*
25.98%
5Y*
10Y*

XWFS.L

1D
0.35%
1M
-5.19%
YTD
-6.55%
6M
-1.19%
1Y
10.12%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNCE.L vs. XWFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XWFS.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FNCE.L vs. XWFS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCE.L
FNCE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FNCE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

XWFS.L
XWFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XWFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
XWFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCE.L vs. XWFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNCE.LXWFS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

0.62

+0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.61

0.93

+0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.13

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

0.75

+0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.05

2.68

+3.37

FNCE.L vs. XWFS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the XWFS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCE.L and XWFS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNCE.LXWFS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

0.62

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.75

+0.49

Correlation

The correlation between FNCE.L and XWFS.L is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FNCE.L vs. XWFS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNCE.L nor XWFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FNCE.L vs. XWFS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCE.L drawdown since its inception was -14.71%, smaller than the maximum XWFS.L drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCE.L and XWFS.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FNCE.LXWFS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.71%

-16.47%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.90%

-12.10%

-0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.96%

-7.96%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-4.16%

+1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

3.39%

+0.16%

Volatility

FNCE.L vs. XWFS.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCE.L) has a higher volatility of 8.27% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L) at 5.34%. This indicates that FNCE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XWFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FNCE.LXWFS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.27%

5.34%

+2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.88%

9.72%

+3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.78%

16.31%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

16.16%

+1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

16.16%

+1.18%