PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNCE.L vs. WDFE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNCE.L vs. WDFE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCE.L) and Invesco S&P World Financials ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDFE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FNCE.L vs. WDFE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FNCE.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF
-6.48%54.52%20.29%11.52%
WDFE.L
Invesco S&P World Financials ESG UCITS ETF Acc
-5.82%17.98%27.97%12.47%
Different Trading Currencies

FNCE.L is traded in GBP, while WDFE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WDFE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCE.L achieves a -6.48% return, which is significantly lower than WDFE.L's -5.82% return.


FNCE.L

1D
1.54%
1M
-8.66%
YTD
-6.48%
6M
3.03%
1Y
22.86%
3Y*
25.98%
5Y*
10Y*

WDFE.L

1D
0.35%
1M
-4.85%
YTD
-5.82%
6M
0.20%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNCE.L vs. WDFE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNCE.L and WDFE.L have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FNCE.L vs. WDFE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCE.L
FNCE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FNCE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

WDFE.L
WDFE.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
WDFE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDFE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDFE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
WDFE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDFE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCE.L vs. WDFE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCE.L) and Invesco S&P World Financials ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDFE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNCE.LWDFE.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

0.52

+0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.61

0.79

+0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.11

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

0.63

+1.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.05

2.33

+3.73

FNCE.L vs. WDFE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the WDFE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCE.L and WDFE.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNCE.LWDFE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

0.52

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

1.17

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between FNCE.L and WDFE.L is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FNCE.L vs. WDFE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNCE.L nor WDFE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FNCE.L vs. WDFE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCE.L drawdown since its inception was -14.71%, smaller than the maximum WDFE.L drawdown of -16.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCE.L and WDFE.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FNCE.LWDFE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.71%

-16.10%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.90%

-13.76%

+0.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.96%

-9.10%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-2.16%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

3.37%

+0.18%

Volatility

FNCE.L vs. WDFE.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCE.L) has a higher volatility of 8.27% compared to Invesco S&P World Financials ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDFE.L) at 5.96%. This indicates that FNCE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDFE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FNCE.LWDFE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.27%

5.96%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.88%

10.12%

+2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.78%

16.57%

+2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

14.63%

+2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

14.63%

+2.71%