FNCE.L vs. XLFS.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FNCE.L (SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF) and XLFS.L (Invesco Financials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Financials Equities funds - FNCE.L tracks the MSCI World/Financials NR USD while XLFS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FNCE.L returned 28.48%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for XLFS.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNCE.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLFS.L.

Performance

FNCE.L vs. XLFS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCE.L) and Invesco Financials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLFS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FNCE.L is traded in GBP, while XLFS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLFS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCE.L achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than XLFS.L's -7.55% return.

FNCE.L

• 1D: -1.71%
• 1M: 1.18%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 6M: 8.99%
• 1Y: 24.80%
• 3Y*: 28.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLFS.L

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -2.45%
• YTD: -7.55%
• 6M: -4.89%
• 1Y: 1.32%
• 3Y*: 14.31%
• 5Y*: 8.41%
• 10Y*: 12.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNCE.L vs. XLFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FNCE.L SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF	2.13%	54.52%	20.29%	18.87%	5.67%
XLFS.L Invesco Financials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc	-7.55%	6.80%	32.42%	6.51%	-1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FNCE.L and XLFS.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022	0.55

The correlation between FNCE.L and XLFS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FNCE.L vs. XLFS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCE.L

FNCE.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
FNCE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FNCE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FNCE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FNCE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
FNCE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 45

XLFS.L

XLFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9
XLFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
XLFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
XLFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9
XLFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
XLFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCE.L vs. XLFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCE.L) and Invesco Financials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNCE.L	XLFS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	0.09	+1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	0.23	+1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.03	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	0.10	+2.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.31	0.24	+7.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNCE.L vs. XLFS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the XLFS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCE.L and XLFS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNCE.L	XLFS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45	0.09	+1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.33	0.60	+0.73

Drawdowns

FNCE.L vs. XLFS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCE.L drawdown since its inception was -14.71%, smaller than the maximum XLFS.L drawdown of -35.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCE.L and XLFS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNCE.L	XLFS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.71%	-35.78%	+21.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.77%	-13.13%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.71%	-18.78%	+4.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.78%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.54%	-9.44%	+6.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	-6.60%	+3.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	5.44%	-2.05%

Volatility

FNCE.L vs. XLFS.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCE.L) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Invesco Financials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLFS.L) at 3.70%. This indicates that FNCE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNCE.L	XLFS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.81%	3.70%	+2.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.19%	10.99%	+3.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.08%	14.59%	+2.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.49%	18.49%	-1.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.49%	20.79%	-3.30%

FNCE.L vs. XLFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XLFS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FNCE.L vs. XLFS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNCE.L nor XLFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNCE.L and XLFS.L in my portfolio?

FNCE.L and XLFS.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FNCE.L or XLFS.L?

On fees, XLFS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNCE.L or XLFS.L?

XLFS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FNCE.L.

What is the main difference between FNCE.L and XLFS.L?

FNCE.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while XLFS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FNCE.L and 0.14% for XLFS.L.