FNCE.L vs. FING.L
FNCE.L (SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF) and FING.L (Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both Financials Equities funds - FNCE.L tracks the MSCI World/Financials NR USD while FING.L tracks the Indxx Global Fintech Thematic. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FNCE.L returned 28.48%/yr vs 2.99%/yr for FING.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FNCE.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FING.L.
Performance
FNCE.L vs. FING.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNCE.L achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than FING.L's -16.91% return.
FNCE.L
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 8.99%
- 1Y
- 24.80%
- 3Y*
- 28.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FING.L
- 1D
- -4.14%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- -16.91%
- 6M
- -19.10%
- 1Y
- -19.47%
- 3Y*
- 2.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNCE.L vs. FING.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNCE.L SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF | 2.13% | 54.52% | 20.29% | 18.87% | 5.67% |
FING.L Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing | -16.91% | -12.16% | 24.04% | 29.09% | -37.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNCE.L and FING.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNCE.L vs. FING.L — Risk / Return Rank
FNCE.L
FING.L
FNCE.L vs. FING.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCE.L) and Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing (FING.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNCE.L | FING.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.89 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | -0.53 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | -1.00 | +8.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNCE.L | FING.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | -0.75 | +2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | -0.45 | +1.78 |
Drawdowns
FNCE.L vs. FING.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNCE.L drawdown since its inception was -14.71%, smaller than the maximum FING.L drawdown of -56.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCE.L and FING.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNCE.L | FING.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.71% | -56.45% | +41.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -36.51% | +24.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.71% | -38.02% | +23.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -46.60% | +44.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.02% | -39.72% | +36.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 19.42% | -16.03% |
Volatility
FNCE.L vs. FING.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCE.L) is 5.81%, while Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing (FING.L) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that FNCE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FING.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNCE.L | FING.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 7.42% | -1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.19% | 19.97% | -5.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 26.07% | -8.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 28.65% | -11.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 28.65% | -11.16% |
FNCE.L vs. FING.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNCE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FING.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNCE.L vs. FING.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FNCE.L nor FING.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FING.L Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.08% |
FNCE.L SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNCE.L and FING.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNCE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNCE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FING.L.
FNCE.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while FING.L tracks Indxx Global Fintech Thematic. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FNCE.L and 0.60% for FING.L.
Find the right allocation for FNCE.L and FING.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer