PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNCE.L vs. FING.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNCE.L vs. FING.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCE.L) and Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing (FING.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCE.L achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than FING.L's -16.91% return.


FNCE.L

1D
-1.71%
1M
1.18%
YTD
2.13%
6M
8.99%
1Y
24.80%
3Y*
28.48%
5Y*
10Y*

FING.L

1D
-4.14%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
-16.91%
6M
-19.10%
1Y
-19.47%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNCE.L vs. FING.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FNCE.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF
2.13%54.52%20.29%18.87%5.67%
FING.L
Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing
-16.91%-12.16%24.04%29.09%-37.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FNCE.L and FING.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNCE.L vs. FING.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCE.L
FNCE.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FNCE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FING.L
FING.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FING.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FING.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FING.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FING.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FING.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCE.L vs. FING.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCE.L) and Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing (FING.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNCE.LFING.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.89

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

-0.53

+2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.31

-1.00

+8.31

FNCE.L vs. FING.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the FING.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCE.L and FING.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNCE.LFING.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

-0.75

+2.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

-0.45

+1.78

Drawdowns

FNCE.L vs. FING.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCE.L drawdown since its inception was -14.71%, smaller than the maximum FING.L drawdown of -56.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCE.L and FING.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNCE.LFING.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.71%

-56.45%

+41.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.77%

-36.51%

+24.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.71%

-38.02%

+23.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-46.60%

+44.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.02%

-39.72%

+36.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

19.42%

-16.03%

Volatility

FNCE.L vs. FING.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCE.L) is 5.81%, while Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing (FING.L) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that FNCE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FING.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNCE.LFING.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

7.42%

-1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.19%

19.97%

-5.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.08%

26.07%

-8.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

28.65%

-11.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

28.65%

-11.16%

FNCE.L vs. FING.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FING.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNCE.L vs. FING.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNCE.L nor FING.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
FING.L
Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Distributing
0.00%0.00%0.21%0.08%
FNCE.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNCE.L and FING.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FNCE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FNCE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FING.L.

FNCE.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while FING.L tracks Indxx Global Fintech Thematic. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FNCE.L and 0.60% for FING.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNCE.L and FING.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer