FNCE.L vs. BNKE.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FNCE.L (SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF) and BNKE.L (Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) are both Financials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, from State Street and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FNCE.L returned 28.84%/yr vs 46.04%/yr for BNKE.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNCE.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for BNKE.L.

Performance

FNCE.L vs. BNKE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCE.L) and Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCE.L achieves a 2.59% return, which is significantly lower than BNKE.L's 4.63% return.

FNCE.L

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 3.72%
• YTD: 2.59%
• 6M: 8.72%
• 1Y: 25.55%
• 3Y*: 28.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNKE.L

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 6.68%
• YTD: 4.63%
• 6M: 11.03%
• 1Y: 45.15%
• 3Y*: 46.04%
• 5Y*: 29.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNCE.L vs. BNKE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FNCE.L SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF	2.59%	54.52%	20.29%	18.87%	5.67%
BNKE.L Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc	4.63%	99.94%	25.19%	27.75%	16.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FNCE.L and BNKE.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022	0.87

The correlation between FNCE.L and BNKE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FNCE.L vs. BNKE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCE.L

FNCE.L Risk / Return Rank: 43
FNCE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FNCE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FNCE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 42
FNCE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
FNCE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 46

BNKE.L

BNKE.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
BNKE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BNKE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNKE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 52
BNKE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BNKE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCE.L vs. BNKE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCE.L) and Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNCE.L	BNKE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	1.93	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	2.65	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.32	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	2.70	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.52	8.72	-1.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNCE.L vs. BNKE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the BNKE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCE.L and BNKE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNCE.L	BNKE.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	1.93	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.34	0.75	+0.59

Drawdowns

FNCE.L vs. BNKE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCE.L drawdown since its inception was -14.71%, smaller than the maximum BNKE.L drawdown of -48.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCE.L and BNKE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNCE.L	BNKE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.71%	-48.52%	+33.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.77%	-16.66%	+4.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.71%	-18.40%	+3.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.11%	-1.62%	-0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	-10.40%	+7.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	5.17%	-1.78%

Volatility

FNCE.L vs. BNKE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCE.L) is 5.39%, while Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that FNCE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNKE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNCE.L	BNKE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	6.10%	-0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.20%	18.62%	-4.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.08%	23.28%	-6.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.48%	25.45%	-7.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.48%	29.62%	-12.14%

FNCE.L vs. BNKE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BNKE.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNCE.L vs. BNKE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNCE.L nor BNKE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNCE.L and BNKE.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FNCE.L and BNKE.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, FNCE.L or BNKE.L?

On fees, FNCE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNCE.L or BNKE.L?

FNCE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for BNKE.L.

What is the main difference between FNCE.L and BNKE.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FNCE.L and 0.30% for BNKE.L.