PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMUN vs. MMMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMUN vs. MMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN) and NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMUN achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than MMMA's 2.85% return.


FMUN

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.62%
6M
-0.38%
YTD
0.55%
1Y
5.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.89%

MMMA

1D
0.39%
1M
-1.14%
6M
1.35%
YTD
2.85%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$585.46K$512.82K$541.96K
$143.96K$107.64K$51.93K

FMUN vs. MMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FMUN and MMMA is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMUN vs. MMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMUN
FMUN Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FMUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUN Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUN Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

MMMA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMUN vs. MMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN) and NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMUNMMMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.78

FMUN vs. MMMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMUN vs. MMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMUN drawdown since its inception was -3.83%, which is greater than MMMA's maximum drawdown of -2.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMUN and MMMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMUNMMMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-2.79%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-1.25%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.11%

-0.61%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

Volatility

FMUN vs. MMMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMUNMMMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06%

4.04%

-0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.04%

4.04%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.04%

4.04%

0.00%

FMUN vs. MMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMUN has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MMMA's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMUN vs. MMMA - Dividend Comparison

FMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than MMMA's 2.68% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FMUN and MMMA have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FMUN is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FMUN is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MMMA.

FMUN has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 2.68% for MMMA.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and NYLI. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for FMUN and 0.35% for MMMA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMUN and MMMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer