PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMUN vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMUN vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMUN achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -39.45% return.


FMUN

1D
0.03%
1M
0.93%
YTD
1.69%
6M
2.24%
1Y
7.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FETH

1D
-5.78%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-39.45%
6M
-42.77%
1Y
-31.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMUN vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FMUN
Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF
1.69%4.25%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-39.45%92.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FMUN and FETH is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMUN vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMUN
FMUN Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FMUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUN Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMUN vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMUNFETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

0.97

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

-0.51

+2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.88

-0.84

+8.72

FMUN vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMUN and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMUNFETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

-0.47

+2.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

-0.41

+1.70

Drawdowns

FMUN vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMUN drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMUN and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMUNFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-64.00%

+60.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-62.95%

+59.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-62.95%

+62.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

-32.73%

+31.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

37.82%

-36.85%

Volatility

FMUN vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN) is 1.27%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that FMUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMUNFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

9.99%

-8.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.27%

46.01%

-43.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12%

68.50%

-65.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.06%

72.27%

-68.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.06%

72.27%

-68.21%

FMUN vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMUN has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FMUN vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FMUN and FETH have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to FMUN (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMUN dropped -3.21% vs FETH's -64.00%.

On 1-year performance, FMUN leads with 7.61% vs -31.75% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, FMUN has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMUN has performed better with a 7.61% return vs -31.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for FMUN.

FMUN has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

FMUN is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for FMUN and 0.00% for FETH.

FMUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMUN and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer