PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMUEX vs. CIMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMUEX vs. CIMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (FMUEX) and Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMUEX achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly higher than CIMDX's -4.16% return.


FMUEX

1D
0.81%
1M
5.31%
YTD
17.52%
6M
17.64%
1Y
35.95%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
11.58%

CIMDX

1D
-1.36%
1M
-0.62%
YTD
-4.16%
6M
-3.24%
1Y
2.76%
3Y*
5.76%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMUEX vs. CIMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMUEX
RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund
17.52%12.79%8.09%17.10%-10.47%31.75%5.65%22.44%-11.62%13.12%
CIMDX
Clarkston Founders Fund
-4.16%7.35%5.67%10.38%-3.67%6.23%23.21%23.74%-7.85%11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FMUEX and CIMDX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.81

The correlation between FMUEX and CIMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMUEX vs. CIMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMUEX
FMUEX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FMUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

CIMDX
CIMDX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CIMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CIMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMUEX vs. CIMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (FMUEX) and Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMUEXCIMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.05

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.97

0.28

+4.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.98

0.70

+17.28

FMUEX vs. CIMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMUEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the CIMDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMUEX and CIMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMUEXCIMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

0.20

+2.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.04

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.41

+0.02

Drawdowns

FMUEX vs. CIMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMUEX drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, which is greater than CIMDX's maximum drawdown of -31.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMUEX and CIMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMUEXCIMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.03%

-31.86%

-26.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-11.30%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.49%

-14.82%

-10.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.49%

-20.40%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.77%

+7.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.07%

-5.91%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

4.51%

-2.41%

Volatility

FMUEX vs. CIMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (FMUEX) is 3.79%, while Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that FMUEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMUEXCIMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

4.82%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

12.09%

-2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.23%

15.98%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

15.99%

+2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.74%

17.51%

+2.23%

FMUEX vs. CIMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMUEX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than CIMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMUEX vs. CIMDX - Dividend Comparison

FMUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than CIMDX's 3.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIMDX
Clarkston Founders Fund
3.38%3.24%0.45%1.62%6.38%0.44%0.91%3.32%2.27%0.41%0.00%0.00%
FMUEX
RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund
1.59%1.87%0.00%4.12%8.26%4.38%1.61%5.57%5.88%3.80%4.80%8.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMUEX and CIMDX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIMDX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FMUEX (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMUEX dropped -58.03% vs CIMDX's -31.86%.

FMUEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMUEX and CIMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer