FMUB vs. MYMF
FMUB (Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF) and MYMF (State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FMUB returned 7.03% vs 2.81% for MYMF. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FMUB charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MYMF.
Performance
FMUB vs. MYMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMUB achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly higher than MYMF's 0.74% return.
FMUB
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 7.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MYMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMUB vs. MYMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FMUB Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF | 2.07% | 4.69% |
MYMF State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.74% | 2.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMUB and MYMF is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMUB vs. MYMF — Risk / Return Rank
FMUB
MYMF
FMUB vs. MYMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) and State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMUB | MYMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 2.19 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 7.40 | -4.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.26 | 27.37 | -16.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMUB vs. MYMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMUB drawdown since its inception was -2.74%, which is greater than MYMF's maximum drawdown of -2.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMUB and MYMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMUB | MYMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.74% | -2.02% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | -0.38% | -2.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | 0.00% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.47% | -0.18% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 0.10% | +0.53% |
Volatility
FMUB vs. MYMF - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF) at 0.24%. This indicates that FMUB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MYMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMUB | MYMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 0.24% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.05% | 0.54% | +1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66% | 0.73% | +1.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.64% | 1.63% | +2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.64% | 1.63% | +2.01% |
FMUB vs. MYMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMUB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MYMF's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMUB vs. MYMF - Dividend Comparison
FMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than MYMF's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FMUB Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF | 3.42% | 2.63% | 0.00% |
MYMF State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.47% | 2.80% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMUB and MYMF have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMUB has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to MYMF (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMUB dropped -2.74% vs MYMF's -2.02%.
On 1-year performance, FMUB leads with 7.03% vs 2.81% for MYMF. On fees, MYMF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MYMF has been the lower-risk option at 0.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FMUB has performed better with a 7.03% return vs 2.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MYMF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FMUB.
FMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 2.47% for MYMF.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FMUB and 0.20% for MYMF.
MYMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.85 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMUB and MYMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer