FMTM vs. XLK
FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMTM is a Momentum fund, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. FMTM is actively managed, while XLK is passively managed. Over the past year, FMTM returned 54.93% vs 45.99% for XLK. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
FMTM vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMTM achieves a 26.52% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 29.35% return.
FMTM
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 19.24%
- YTD
- 26.52%
- 1Y
- 54.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 27.43%
- YTD
- 29.35%
- 1Y
- 45.99%
- 3Y*
- 30.12%
- 5Y*
- 20.60%
- 10Y*
- 24.88%
FMTM vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 26.52% | 28.21% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.35% | 34.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMTM and XLK is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FMTM and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMTM vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
FMTM
XLK
FMTM vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMTM | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.32 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.46 | 2.86 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.90 | 8.70 | +7.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMTM vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMTM drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTM and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMTM | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -82.05% | +69.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.12% | -15.92% | +3.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.83% | -6.16% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -34.85% | +32.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 5.23% | -1.84% |
Volatility
FMTM vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) have volatilities of 11.40% and 10.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMTM | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.40% | 10.98% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.31% | 20.68% | -0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.66% | 24.26% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.46% | 25.52% | -1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.46% | 24.77% | -0.31% |
FMTM vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMTM vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
FMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than XLK's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 0.23% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.43% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMTM and XLK have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMTM has higher volatility (11.40%) compared to XLK (10.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMTM dropped -12.12% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 54.93% vs 45.99% for XLK. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 10.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 54.93% return vs 45.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FMTM.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.23% for FMTM.
FMTM is categorized as Momentum, while XLK is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FMTM and 0.08% for XLK.
FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMTM and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer