FMTM vs. SPVM
FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) and SPVM (Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. FMTM is actively managed, while SPVM is passively managed. Over the past year, FMTM returned 63.62% vs 28.06% for SPVM. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SPVM.
Performance
FMTM vs. SPVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMTM achieves a 31.75% return, which is significantly higher than SPVM's 8.29% return.
FMTM
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 34.74%
- 1Y
- 63.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPVM
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 19.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
FMTM vs. SPVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 31.75% | 27.90% |
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 8.29% | 20.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMTM and SPVM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025 | 0.55 |
The correlation between FMTM and SPVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMTM vs. SPVM — Risk / Return Rank
FMTM
SPVM
FMTM vs. SPVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMTM | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.42 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.28 | 4.29 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.62 | 16.33 | +4.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMTM | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.43 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.38 | 0.63 | +1.76 |
Drawdowns
FMTM vs. SPVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMTM drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum SPVM drawdown of -45.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTM and SPVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMTM | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -45.35% | +33.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.12% | -6.57% | -5.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.70% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -4.99% | +3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 1.72% | +1.38% |
Volatility
FMTM vs. SPVM - Volatility Comparison
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) at 2.79%. This indicates that FMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMTM | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | 2.79% | +3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.83% | 7.48% | +10.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.82% | 11.63% | +11.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.94% | 16.77% | +6.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.94% | 19.57% | +3.37% |
FMTM vs. SPVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMTM vs. SPVM - Dividend Comparison
FMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than SPVM's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 1.91% | 2.02% | 1.91% | 2.45% | 2.33% | 1.41% | 2.11% | 2.40% | 3.10% | 1.68% | 2.80% | 2.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMTM and SPVM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMTM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to SPVM (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMTM dropped -12.12% vs SPVM's -45.35%.
On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 63.62% vs 28.06% for SPVM. On fees, SPVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 63.62% return vs 28.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FMTM.
SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.22% for FMTM.
Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FMTM and 0.39% for SPVM.
FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMTM and SPVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer