FMTM vs. DVOL
FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) and DVOL (First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF) are both Momentum funds. FMTM is actively managed, while DVOL is passively managed. Over the past year, FMTM returned 63.62% vs 0.82% for DVOL. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DVOL.
Performance
FMTM vs. DVOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMTM achieves a 31.75% return, which is significantly higher than DVOL's 1.61% return.
FMTM
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 34.74%
- 1Y
- 63.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DVOL
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 0.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- —
FMTM vs. DVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 31.75% | 27.90% |
DVOL First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF | 1.61% | 0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMTM and DVOL is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025 | 0.58 |
The correlation between FMTM and DVOL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMTM vs. DVOL — Risk / Return Rank
FMTM
DVOL
FMTM vs. DVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMTM | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.02 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.28 | 0.08 | +5.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.62 | 0.30 | +20.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMTM | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 0.07 | +2.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.38 | 0.50 | +1.88 |
Drawdowns
FMTM vs. DVOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMTM drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum DVOL drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTM and DVOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMTM | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -38.26% | +26.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.12% | -9.82% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.85% | +4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -7.17% | +5.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 2.87% | +0.23% |
Volatility
FMTM vs. DVOL - Volatility Comparison
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) at 2.91%. This indicates that FMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMTM | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | 2.91% | +3.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.83% | 9.35% | +8.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.82% | 11.79% | +11.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.94% | 14.40% | +8.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.94% | 17.72% | +5.22% |
FMTM vs. DVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DVOL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMTM vs. DVOL - Dividend Comparison
FMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than DVOL's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVOL First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF | 0.68% | 0.86% | 0.67% | 1.28% | 1.37% | 0.47% | 0.60% | 1.79% | 0.39% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMTM and DVOL have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMTM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to DVOL (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMTM dropped -12.12% vs DVOL's -38.26%.
On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 63.62% vs 0.82% for DVOL. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DVOL has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 63.62% return vs 0.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DVOL.
DVOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.22% for FMTM.
Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FMTM and 0.60% for DVOL.
FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMTM and DVOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer