PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMTM vs. DVOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMTM vs. DVOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMTM achieves a 31.75% return, which is significantly higher than DVOL's 1.61% return.


FMTM

1D
0.50%
1M
6.28%
YTD
31.75%
6M
34.74%
1Y
63.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DVOL

1D
0.41%
1M
-3.19%
YTD
1.61%
6M
2.02%
1Y
0.82%
3Y*
12.78%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMTM vs. DVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FMTM and DVOL is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025

0.58

The correlation between FMTM and DVOL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMTM vs. DVOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

DVOL
DVOL Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMTM vs. DVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMTMDVOLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.02

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.28

0.08

+5.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.62

0.30

+20.32

FMTM vs. DVOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMTM Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the DVOL Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMTM and DVOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMTMDVOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

0.07

+2.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.38

0.50

+1.88

Drawdowns

FMTM vs. DVOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMTM drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum DVOL drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTM and DVOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMTMDVOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-38.26%

+26.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-9.82%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.85%

+4.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.89%

-7.17%

+5.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.87%

+0.23%

Volatility

FMTM vs. DVOL - Volatility Comparison

MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) at 2.91%. This indicates that FMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMTMDVOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

2.91%

+3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.83%

9.35%

+8.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.82%

11.79%

+11.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.94%

14.40%

+8.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.94%

17.72%

+5.22%

FMTM vs. DVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DVOL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMTM vs. DVOL - Dividend Comparison

FMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than DVOL's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DVOL
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF
0.68%0.86%0.67%1.28%1.37%0.47%0.60%1.79%0.39%
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
0.22%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMTM and DVOL have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMTM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to DVOL (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMTM dropped -12.12% vs DVOL's -38.26%.

On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 63.62% vs 0.82% for DVOL. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DVOL has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 63.62% return vs 0.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DVOL.

DVOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.22% for FMTM.

Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FMTM and 0.60% for DVOL.

FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMTM and DVOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer