FMTM vs. CCOR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR).

FMTM and CCOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CCOR is an actively managed fund by Core Alternative Capital. It was launched on May 24, 2017.

Performance

FMTM vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FMTM vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	8.17%	27.90%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	-0.34%	-0.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMTM achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -0.34% return.

FMTM

• 1D: 4.80%
• 1M: -6.51%
• YTD: 8.17%
• 6M: 16.49%
• 1Y: 36.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCOR

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -4.07%
• YTD: -0.34%
• 6M: 0.35%
• 1Y: -1.48%
• 3Y*: -3.32%
• 5Y*: -0.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMTM vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

CCOR

Core Alternative ETF

FMTM

MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF

Return for Risk

FMTM vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMTM

FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 85
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 91

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 9
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMTM vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FMTM	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	-0.14	+1.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	-0.14	+2.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	0.98	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	-0.19	+3.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.97	-0.35	+12.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FMTM vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMTM and CCOR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMTM	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.58	-0.14	+1.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.61	0.15	+1.46

Correlation

The correlation between FMTM and CCOR is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FMTM vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

FMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than CCOR's 1.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	0.27%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	1.07%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%

Drawdowns

FMTM vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMTM drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTM and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMTM	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.12%	-22.99%	+10.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.12%	-9.17%	-2.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.90%	-17.23%	+9.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.88%	-7.07%	+5.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	4.95%	-1.76%

Volatility

FMTM vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a higher volatility of 11.09% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.17%. This indicates that FMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMTM	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.09%	2.17%	+8.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.22%	5.44%	+13.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.34%	10.74%	+12.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.18%	11.13%	+12.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.18%	10.81%	+12.37%