PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMTL vs. TURF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMTL vs. TURF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMTL achieves a 13.89% return, which is significantly higher than TURF's 7.14% return.


FMTL

1D
0.81%
1M
-11.71%
YTD
13.89%
6M
13.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TURF

1D
0.44%
1M
-9.59%
YTD
7.14%
6M
6.81%
1Y
27.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMTL vs. TURF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FMTL and TURF is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMTL vs. TURF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMTL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


TURF
TURF Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TURF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TURF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TURF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TURF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TURF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMTL vs. TURF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMTLTURFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.26

FMTL vs. TURF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMTL vs. TURF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, which is greater than TURF's maximum drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTL and TURF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMTLTURFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-13.04%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.61%

-12.66%

-1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-1.92%

-3.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

Volatility

FMTL vs. TURF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMTLTURFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.42%

17.33%

+23.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.42%

17.17%

+23.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.42%

17.17%

+23.25%

FMTL vs. TURF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TURF's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMTL vs. TURF - Dividend Comparison

FMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than TURF's 1.39% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FMTL and TURF have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TURF is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TURF is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FMTL.

FMTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.39% for TURF.

FMTL is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while TURF is Natural Resources. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FMTL and 0.44% for TURF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMTL and TURF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer