PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMTL vs. TURF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMTL vs. TURF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMTL achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly higher than TURF's 14.05% return.


FMTL

1D
-7.48%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
19.55%
6M
28.10%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TURF

1D
-4.31%
1M
-5.48%
YTD
14.05%
6M
16.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMTL vs. TURF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FMTL and TURF is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMTL vs. TURF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FMTL vs. TURF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMTLTURFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.25

2.02

+0.23

Drawdowns

FMTL vs. TURF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, which is greater than TURF's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTL and TURF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMTLTURFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-7.03%

-15.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.37%

-7.03%

-3.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-1.55%

-3.54%

Volatility

FMTL vs. TURF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMTLTURFDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.29%

17.05%

+23.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.29%

17.05%

+23.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.29%

17.05%

+23.24%

FMTL vs. TURF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TURF's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMTL vs. TURF - Dividend Comparison

FMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than TURF's 1.31% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FMTL and TURF have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TURF is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TURF is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FMTL.

TURF has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.05% for FMTL.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FMTL and 0.44% for TURF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMTL and TURF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer