FMTL vs. REMX
FMTL (First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF) and REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) are both Rare Earth & Strategic Metals funds - FMTL tracks the Indxx Global Critical Metals Index while REMX tracks the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMTL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.
Performance
FMTL vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMTL achieves a 13.89% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 17.06% return.
FMTL
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -11.71%
- YTD
- 13.89%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REMX
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- -11.73%
- YTD
- 17.06%
- 6M
- 12.76%
- 1Y
- 112.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.03%
- 5Y*
- 2.99%
- 10Y*
- 9.32%
FMTL vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF | 13.89% | 21.85% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 17.06% | 17.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMTL and REMX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMTL vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank
FMTL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
REMX
FMTL vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMTL | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.38 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMTL vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTL and REMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMTL | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.44% | -90.20% | +67.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -62.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.61% | -60.38% | +45.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -66.81% | +61.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.09% | — |
Volatility
FMTL vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMTL | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.42% | 50.13% | -9.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.42% | 40.72% | -0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.42% | 37.16% | +3.26% |
FMTL vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMTL vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
FMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than REMX's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF | 1.63% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.50% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMTL and REMX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FMTL.
FMTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.50% for REMX.
FMTL tracks Indxx Global Critical Metals Index, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FMTL and 0.59% for REMX.
Find the right allocation for FMTL and REMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer