FMTL vs. NANR
FMTL (First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF) and NANR (SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds - FMTL tracks the Indxx Global Critical Metals Index while NANR tracks the S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMTL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NANR.
Performance
FMTL vs. NANR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FMTL having a 19.55% return and NANR slightly lower at 18.67%.
FMTL
- 1D
- -7.48%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 6M
- 28.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NANR
- 1D
- -4.58%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- 18.67%
- 6M
- 21.07%
- 1Y
- 47.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.75%
- 5Y*
- 15.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.77%
FMTL vs. NANR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF | 19.55% | 21.20% |
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF | 18.67% | 10.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMTL and NANR is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMTL vs. NANR — Risk / Return Rank
FMTL
NANR
FMTL vs. NANR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMTL | NANR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.25 | 0.61 | +1.65 |
Drawdowns
FMTL vs. NANR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, smaller than the maximum NANR drawdown of -49.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTL and NANR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMTL | NANR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.44% | -49.15% | +26.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.37% | -6.60% | -3.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -8.39% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.56% | — |
Volatility
FMTL vs. NANR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMTL | NANR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.29% | 18.73% | +21.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.29% | 22.97% | +17.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.29% | 23.57% | +16.72% |
FMTL vs. NANR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than NANR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMTL vs. NANR - Dividend Comparison
FMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than NANR's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF | 1.77% | 1.77% | 2.20% | 2.78% | 2.70% | 2.61% | 2.73% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.83% | 5.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMTL and NANR have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NANR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NANR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FMTL.
NANR has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.05% for FMTL.
FMTL tracks Indxx Global Critical Metals Index, while NANR tracks S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FMTL and 0.35% for NANR.
Find the right allocation for FMTL and NANR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer