PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMSGX vs. RTXAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FMSGX vs. RTXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier MFG Global Sustainable Fund (FMSGX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FMSGX vs. RTXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FMSGX
Frontier MFG Global Sustainable Fund
-10.23%23.05%20.91%31.65%-22.11%15.83%7.74%8.17%
RTXAX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund
11.49%13.56%1.50%7.40%-11.66%26.57%3.73%6.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMSGX achieves a -10.23% return, which is significantly lower than RTXAX's 11.49% return.


FMSGX

1D
0.75%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
-10.23%
6M
-7.97%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*

RTXAX

1D
0.13%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
11.49%
6M
14.38%
1Y
24.85%
3Y*
10.58%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMSGX vs. RTXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMSGX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than RTXAX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FMSGX vs. RTXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMSGX
FMSGX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FMSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FMSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

RTXAX
RTXAX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RTXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
RTXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMSGX vs. RTXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier MFG Global Sustainable Fund (FMSGX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMSGXRTXAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

1.69

-1.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.80

2.24

-1.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.35

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

1.89

-1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.81

10.79

-8.98

FMSGX vs. RTXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMSGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the RTXAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMSGX and RTXAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMSGXRTXAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

1.69

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.47

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.40

+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between FMSGX and RTXAX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FMSGX vs. RTXAX - Dividend Comparison

FMSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.86%, more than RTXAX's 2.57% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
FMSGX
Frontier MFG Global Sustainable Fund
9.86%8.85%9.34%0.91%0.62%3.33%0.23%0.06%
RTXAX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund
2.57%2.86%2.05%1.98%3.11%1.74%1.71%0.84%

Drawdowns

FMSGX vs. RTXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMSGX drawdown since its inception was -28.73%, smaller than the maximum RTXAX drawdown of -40.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMSGX and RTXAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FMSGXRTXAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.73%

-40.68%

+11.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.66%

-13.11%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.74%

-24.63%

-3.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.00%

-3.32%

-8.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.92%

-7.96%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

2.29%

+0.68%

Volatility

FMSGX vs. RTXAX - Volatility Comparison

Frontier MFG Global Sustainable Fund (FMSGX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) have volatilities of 4.08% and 4.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FMSGXRTXAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

4.12%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.21%

8.24%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.62%

15.04%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.18%

15.85%

-1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.48%

20.26%

-3.78%