PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMSGX vs. FMIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMSGX vs. FMIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier MFG Global Sustainable Fund (FMSGX) and Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMSGX achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than FMIEX's 13.17% return.


FMSGX

1D
-1.27%
1M
0.80%
YTD
-0.73%
6M
1.66%
1Y
9.56%
3Y*
18.23%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*

FMIEX

1D
0.16%
1M
0.56%
YTD
13.17%
6M
15.54%
1Y
29.59%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
11.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMSGX vs. FMIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FMSGX
Frontier MFG Global Sustainable Fund
-0.73%23.05%20.91%31.65%-22.11%15.83%7.74%8.17%
FMIEX
Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares
13.17%30.93%8.66%5.67%-0.12%25.11%2.04%7.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FMSGX and FMIEX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019

0.61

The correlation between FMSGX and FMIEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMSGX vs. FMIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMSGX
FMSGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FMSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FMSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FMIEX
FMIEX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FMIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FMIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMSGX vs. FMIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier MFG Global Sustainable Fund (FMSGX) and Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMSGXFMIEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

3.21

-2.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

4.61

-3.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.56

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

4.24

-3.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.92

17.24

-14.32

FMSGX vs. FMIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMSGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the FMIEX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMSGX and FMIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMSGXFMIEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

3.21

-2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.89

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.60

+0.10

Drawdowns

FMSGX vs. FMIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMSGX drawdown since its inception was -28.73%, smaller than the maximum FMIEX drawdown of -49.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMSGX and FMIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMSGXFMIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.73%

-49.85%

+21.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.66%

-7.04%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.66%

-9.52%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.74%

-18.63%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.69%

-1.26%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-6.58%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

1.73%

+1.62%

Volatility

FMSGX vs. FMIEX - Volatility Comparison

Frontier MFG Global Sustainable Fund (FMSGX) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX) at 2.82%. This indicates that FMSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMSGXFMIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

2.82%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

7.22%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.06%

9.30%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.27%

12.73%

+1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.40%

15.72%

+0.68%

FMSGX vs. FMIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMSGX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than FMIEX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMSGX vs. FMIEX - Dividend Comparison

FMSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.91%, more than FMIEX's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMIEX
Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares
5.05%5.76%9.02%3.27%8.54%4.34%1.74%3.82%18.46%16.45%5.16%11.75%
FMSGX
Frontier MFG Global Sustainable Fund
8.91%8.85%9.34%0.91%0.62%3.33%0.23%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMSGX and FMIEX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMSGX has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to FMIEX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMSGX dropped -28.73% vs FMIEX's -49.85%.

FMIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMSGX and FMIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer