FMSFX vs. WACPX
FMSFX (Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund) and WACPX (Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I) are both Total Bond Market funds. Over the past 10 years, FMSFX returned 1.25%/yr vs 1.76%/yr for WACPX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.
Performance
FMSFX vs. WACPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMSFX achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than WACPX's -0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FMSFX has underperformed WACPX with an annualized return of 1.25%, while WACPX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.76% annualized return.
FMSFX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 5.80%
- 3Y*
- 4.25%
- 5Y*
- 0.14%
- 10Y*
- 1.25%
WACPX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- 3.58%
- 5Y*
- -1.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.76%
FMSFX vs. WACPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMSFX Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund | 0.66% | 8.29% | 1.00% | 4.91% | -12.61% | -1.20% | 4.41% | 6.43% | 0.79% | 2.35% |
WACPX Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I | -0.08% | 7.99% | -0.77% | 7.51% | -18.79% | -2.24% | 9.42% | 12.29% | -1.47% | 7.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMSFX and WACPX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 1998 | 0.79 |
The correlation between FMSFX and WACPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.95 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMSFX vs. WACPX — Risk / Return Rank
FMSFX
WACPX
FMSFX vs. WACPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund (FMSFX) and Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I (WACPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMSFX | WACPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.19 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 1.29 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.71 | 3.76 | +2.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMSFX vs. WACPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMSFX drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, smaller than the maximum WACPX drawdown of -25.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMSFX and WACPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMSFX | WACPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.81% | -25.86% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.81% | -3.60% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.04% | -9.55% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.66% | -25.46% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.81% | -25.86% | +7.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -8.62% | +7.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -3.62% | +1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 1.23% | -0.33% |
Volatility
FMSFX vs. WACPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund (FMSFX) is 1.23%, while Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I (WACPX) has a volatility of 1.30%. This indicates that FMSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WACPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMSFX | WACPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 1.30% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.90% | 3.20% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.94% | 4.27% | -0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.80% | 7.41% | -0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.14% | 6.18% | -1.04% |
FMSFX vs. WACPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FMSFX and WACPX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Dividends
FMSFX vs. WACPX - Dividend Comparison
FMSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than WACPX's 4.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMSFX Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund | 3.92% | 3.93% | 4.12% | 3.50% | 1.43% | 0.62% | 2.40% | 2.62% | 2.57% | 2.60% | 2.65% | 2.05% |
WACPX Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I | 4.80% | 4.70% | 4.80% | 4.88% | 3.46% | 2.99% | 4.12% | 4.98% | 4.01% | 3.30% | 4.77% | 3.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, FMSFX and WACPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
WACPX has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to FMSFX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMSFX dropped -18.81% vs WACPX's -25.86%.
FMSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMSFX and WACPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer