PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMRAX vs. PTDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMRAX vs. PTDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 (FMRAX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FMRAX having a 6.76% return and PTDIX slightly higher at 7.02%.


FMRAX

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.85%
YTD
6.76%
6M
7.38%
1Y
16.12%
3Y*
11.56%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*

PTDIX

1D
-0.72%
1M
2.29%
YTD
7.02%
6M
7.37%
1Y
18.19%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
10.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMRAX vs. PTDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FMRAX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030
6.76%14.35%7.19%12.51%-16.27%8.90%13.83%7.61%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
7.02%15.59%17.43%18.33%-18.13%15.35%16.04%9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FMRAX and PTDIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2019

0.92

The correlation between FMRAX and PTDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMRAX vs. PTDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMRAX
FMRAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FMRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FMRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PTDIX
PTDIX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PTDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PTDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMRAX vs. PTDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 (FMRAX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMRAXPTDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.35

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.53

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.95

11.23

+1.72

FMRAX vs. PTDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMRAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the PTDIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMRAX and PTDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMRAXPTDIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

1.88

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.60

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.48

+0.29

Drawdowns

FMRAX vs. PTDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMRAX drawdown since its inception was -22.45%, smaller than the maximum PTDIX drawdown of -54.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMRAX and PTDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMRAXPTDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.45%

-54.38%

+31.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.61%

-7.32%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.76%

-13.05%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.45%

-25.43%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.72%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-7.49%

+2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

1.64%

-0.35%

Volatility

FMRAX vs. PTDIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 (FMRAX) is 2.66%, while Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX) has a volatility of 2.98%. This indicates that FMRAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMRAXPTDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.98%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.88%

7.87%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.08%

9.84%

-2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.86%

13.50%

-4.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.02%

13.83%

-3.81%

FMRAX vs. PTDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMRAX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than PTDIX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMRAX vs. PTDIX - Dividend Comparison

FMRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than PTDIX's 9.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMRAX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030
2.78%2.57%2.50%2.39%4.02%4.74%3.01%1.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
9.16%9.80%12.28%4.40%8.61%8.92%6.01%7.26%9.28%6.07%4.86%6.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FMRAX and PTDIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PTDIX has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to FMRAX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMRAX dropped -22.45% vs PTDIX's -54.38%.

FMRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMRAX and PTDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer