PortfoliosLab logo
FMRAX vs. FBALX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FMRAX and FBALX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FMRAX vs. FBALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 (FMRAX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

FMRAX:

0.69%

FBALX:

12.87%

Max Drawdown

FMRAX:

-0.09%

FBALX:

-42.81%

Current Drawdown

FMRAX:

-0.09%

FBALX:

-6.22%

Returns By Period


FMRAX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FBALX

YTD

-2.06%

1M

4.31%

6M

-4.65%

1Y

2.67%

5Y*

6.01%

10Y*

4.32%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMRAX vs. FBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMRAX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than FBALX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FMRAX vs. FBALX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMRAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FMRAX is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FMRAX is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FMRAX is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FMRAX is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FMRAX is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FMRAX is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FBALX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBALX is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBALX is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBALX is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBALX is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBALX is 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBALX is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FMRAX vs. FBALX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 (FMRAX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

FMRAX vs. FBALX - Dividend Comparison

FMRAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FMRAX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
1.88%1.81%1.70%1.47%0.88%1.29%1.70%1.85%1.58%1.61%7.96%10.55%

Drawdowns

FMRAX vs. FBALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMRAX drawdown since its inception was -0.09%, smaller than the maximum FBALX drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMRAX and FBALX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FMRAX vs. FBALX - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...