FMPAX vs. CISMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FMPAX (Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A) and CISMX (Clarkston Partners Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FMPAX returned 10.95%/yr vs 5.97%/yr for CISMX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FMPAX charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for CISMX.

Performance

FMPAX vs. CISMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A (FMPAX) and Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMPAX achieves a 19.04% return, which is significantly higher than CISMX's -0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, FMPAX has outperformed CISMX with an annualized return of 10.95%, while CISMX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.97% annualized return.

FMPAX

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 4.53%
• YTD: 19.04%
• 6M: 20.18%
• 1Y: 36.77%
• 3Y*: 22.03%
• 5Y*: 12.07%
• 10Y*: 10.95%

CISMX

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: -0.48%
• 6M: -0.89%
• 1Y: -0.21%
• 3Y*: -0.02%
• 5Y*: -1.85%
• 10Y*: 5.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMPAX vs. CISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FMPAX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A	19.04%	12.75%	14.22%	22.18%	-10.89%	33.60%	0.68%	23.19%	-19.16%	16.73%
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund	-0.48%	-8.37%	4.49%	6.41%	-0.40%	7.94%	17.42%	23.98%	-7.25%	12.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FMPAX and CISMX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2015	0.87

The correlation between FMPAX and CISMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FMPAX vs. CISMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMPAX

FMPAX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FMPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FMPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FMPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FMPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FMPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

CISMX

CISMX Risk / Return Rank: 3
CISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMPAX vs. CISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A (FMPAX) and Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FMPAX	CISMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	0.03	+2.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	0.18	+3.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.02	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	0.05	+3.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.48	0.12	+14.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FMPAX vs. CISMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the CISMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMPAX and CISMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMPAX	CISMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	0.03	+2.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	-0.11	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.33	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.36	+0.03

Drawdowns

FMPAX vs. CISMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMPAX drawdown since its inception was -63.15%, which is greater than CISMX's maximum drawdown of -33.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMPAX and CISMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMPAX	CISMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.15%	-33.80%	-29.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.34%	-10.54%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.79%	-21.19%	-2.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.79%	-21.19%	-2.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.47%	-33.80%	-11.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-14.82%	+14.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.73%	-6.69%	-3.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	4.68%	-2.00%

Volatility

FMPAX vs. CISMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A (FMPAX) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) at 4.55%. This indicates that FMPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMPAX	CISMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	4.55%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.04%	12.71%	-0.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.22%	17.05%	-0.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.18%	17.48%	+2.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.12%	18.29%	+2.83%

FMPAX vs. CISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMPAX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than CISMX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMPAX vs. CISMX - Dividend Comparison

FMPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than CISMX's 4.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund	4.67%	4.65%	1.05%	3.76%	16.95%	0.81%	3.73%	3.79%	7.15%	1.30%	1.17%	0.09%
FMPAX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A	6.57%	8.24%	10.38%	0.96%	13.09%	1.08%	1.78%	1.61%	14.62%	8.77%	1.11%	4.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMPAX and CISMX in my portfolio?

FMPAX and CISMX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMPAX or CISMX?

FMPAX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to CISMX (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMPAX dropped -63.15% vs CISMX's -33.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.