FMOTX vs. ATOIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund (FMOTX) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX).
FMOTX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Aug 2, 1987. ATOIX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Dec 4, 2002.
Performance
FMOTX vs. ATOIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FMOTX vs. ATOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMOTX Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund | -0.47% | 3.09% | 2.02% | 6.20% | -8.88% | 2.15% | 4.33% | 7.53% | 1.13% | 5.12% |
ATOIX abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund | 0.35% | 3.33% | 3.14% | 3.27% | 0.87% | -0.04% | 0.88% | 1.40% | 1.54% | 2.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMOTX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than ATOIX's 0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FMOTX has outperformed ATOIX with an annualized return of 2.05%, while ATOIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.73% annualized return.
FMOTX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 2.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- 2.05%
ATOIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 2.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 1.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FMOTX vs. ATOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMOTX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ATOIX's 0.44% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FMOTX vs. ATOIX — Risk / Return Rank
FMOTX
ATOIX
FMOTX vs. ATOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund (FMOTX) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMOTX | ATOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 3.51 | -2.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.06 | 18.38 | -17.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 11.59 | -10.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 32.23 | -31.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.16 | 93.42 | -91.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMOTX | ATOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 3.51 | -2.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 2.69 | -2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 2.24 | -1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.16 | 2.45 | -1.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between FMOTX and ATOIX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FMOTX vs. ATOIX - Dividend Comparison
FMOTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than ATOIX's 2.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMOTX Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund | 3.25% | 3.47% | 3.44% | 3.16% | 2.84% | 2.39% | 2.74% | 3.43% | 3.35% | 3.29% | 3.56% | 3.64% |
ATOIX abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund | 2.90% | 3.27% | 3.09% | 3.02% | 1.07% | 0.06% | 0.88% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 2.20% | 0.61% | 0.52% |
Drawdowns
FMOTX vs. ATOIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMOTX drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, which is greater than ATOIX's maximum drawdown of -1.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMOTX and ATOIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMOTX | ATOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -1.46% | -13.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.98% | -0.10% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.40% | -0.37% | -14.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.40% | -0.43% | -13.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -0.10% | -2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -0.06% | -1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 0.03% | +1.68% |
Volatility
FMOTX vs. ATOIX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund (FMOTX) has a higher volatility of 0.89% compared to abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX) at 0.10%. This indicates that FMOTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FMOTX | ATOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 0.10% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.47% | 0.65% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.93% | 0.92% | +4.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.04% | 0.81% | +3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.98% | 0.78% | +3.20% |