FMNY vs. FBDC
FMNY (First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF) and FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMNY is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust, while FBDC is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. FMNY charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for FBDC.
Performance
FMNY vs. FBDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMNY achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than FBDC's -8.64% return.
FMNY
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 7.45%
- 3Y*
- 4.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.59%
- 10Y*
- —
FBDC
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -10.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMNY vs. FBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FMNY First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF | 1.87% | 4.70% |
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | -8.64% | -2.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMNY and FBDC is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMNY vs. FBDC — Risk / Return Rank
FMNY
FBDC
FMNY vs. FBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF (FMNY) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMNY | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.54 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMNY | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | -0.64 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
FMNY vs. FBDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMNY drawdown since its inception was -15.90%, smaller than the maximum FBDC drawdown of -20.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMNY and FBDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMNY | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.90% | -20.60% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -16.44% | +15.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -10.19% | +4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | — | — |
Volatility
FMNY vs. FBDC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMNY | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29% | 18.26% | -14.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 18.26% | -14.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 18.26% | -14.27% |
FMNY vs. FBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMNY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FBDC's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMNY vs. FBDC - Dividend Comparison
FMNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than FBDC's 11.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | 11.41% | 5.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FMNY First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF | 3.68% | 3.64% | 3.56% | 3.25% | 2.34% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMNY and FBDC have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FMNY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FMNY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.
FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.41%, compared with 3.68% for FMNY.
FMNY is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FBDC is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FMNY and 1.35% for FBDC.
Find the right allocation for FMNY and FBDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer