PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMNY vs. FBDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMNY vs. FBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF (FMNY) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMNY achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than FBDC's -5.45% return.


FMNY

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.27%
6M
1.03%
YTD
1.77%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
0.35%
10Y*

FBDC

1D
-1.41%
1M
4.92%
6M
-7.40%
YTD
-5.45%
1Y
-13.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMNY vs. FBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FMNY and FBDC is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMNY vs. FBDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMNY
FMNY Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FMNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMNY Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FMNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMNY Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FBDC
FBDC Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMNY vs. FBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF (FMNY) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMNYFBDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

0.89

+0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

-0.69

+3.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.64

-1.18

+9.82

FMNY vs. FBDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMNY Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the FBDC Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMNY and FBDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMNY vs. FBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMNY drawdown since its inception was -15.90%, smaller than the maximum FBDC drawdown of -20.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMNY and FBDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMNYFBDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.90%

-20.60%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-19.79%

+16.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-13.53%

+12.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-10.75%

+5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

12.26%

-11.39%

Volatility

FMNY vs. FBDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF (FMNY) is 0.60%, while FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that FMNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMNYFBDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

4.74%

-4.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.30%

14.53%

-12.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26%

18.09%

-14.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.00%

17.88%

-13.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.95%

17.88%

-13.93%

FMNY vs. FBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMNY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FBDC's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMNY vs. FBDC - Dividend Comparison

FMNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, less than FBDC's 12.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FBDC
FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF
12.16%5.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FMNY
First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF
3.71%3.64%3.56%3.25%2.34%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMNY and FBDC have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBDC has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to FMNY (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMNY dropped -15.90% vs FBDC's -20.60%.

On 1-year performance, FMNY leads with 7.46% vs -13.53% for FBDC. On fees, FMNY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FMNY has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMNY has performed better with a 7.46% return vs -13.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMNY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.

FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 12.16%, compared with 3.71% for FMNY.

FMNY is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FBDC is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FMNY and 1.35% for FBDC.

FMNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMNY and FBDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer