FMNDX vs. FSMDX

Last updated Jul 23, 2026

FMNDX (Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class) and FSMDX (Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FMNDX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while FSMDX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index. Over the past 10 years, FMNDX returned 1.61%/yr vs 11.40%/yr for FSMDX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FMNDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FSMDX.

Performance

FMNDX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMNDX achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than FSMDX's 14.27% return. Over the past 10 years, FMNDX has underperformed FSMDX with an annualized return of 1.61%, while FSMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.40% annualized return.

FMNDX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.13%
• 6M: 1.04%
• YTD: 1.14%
• 1Y: 2.74%
• 3Y*: 3.08%
• 5Y*: 2.13%
• 10Y*: 1.61%
• ALL TIME*: 1.39%

FSMDX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 0.21%
• 6M: 9.07%
• YTD: 14.27%
• 1Y: 17.33%
• 3Y*: 14.97%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: 11.40%
• ALL TIME*: 12.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FMNDX Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FMNDX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FMNDX Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class	1.14%	3.31%	3.04%	3.37%	-0.09%	0.03%	0.86%	2.00%	1.58%	1.10%
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	14.27%	10.58%	15.55%	17.20%	-17.27%	22.56%	17.13%	30.53%	-9.38%	18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FMNDX and FSMDX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013	0.03

Return for Risk

FMNDX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMNDX

FMNDX Risk / Return Rank: 98
FMNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FMNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FMNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FMNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FMNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

FSMDX

FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 50
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMNDX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMNDX	FSMDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.01	1.37	+1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	8.25	2.02	+6.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.48	1.24	+2.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.27	2.31	+6.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	40.10	8.80	+31.29

FMNDX vs. FSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMNDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is higher than the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMNDX and FSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FMNDX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMNDX drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum FSMDX drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMNDX and FSMDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMNDX	FSMDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-40.35%	+38.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.30%	-8.16%	+7.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.09%	-20.92%	+19.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.09%	-26.07%	+24.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-1.69%	-40.35%	+38.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-1.15%	+1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.10%	-4.92%	+4.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.07%	2.13%	-2.06%

Volatility

FMNDX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX) is 0.25%, while Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that FMNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMNDX	FSMDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.25%	2.80%	-2.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.62%	10.40%	-9.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92%	13.74%	-12.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.07%	18.26%	-17.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.91%	19.27%	-18.36%

FMNDX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FMNDX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

FMNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than FSMDX's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMNDX Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class	2.81%	2.95%	2.99%	2.60%	0.61%	0.23%	0.85%	1.58%	1.46%	1.00%	0.75%	0.38%
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund	0.76%	1.10%	2.46%	1.39%	2.07%	3.35%	2.34%	2.86%	2.21%	2.17%	2.23%	2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMNDX and FSMDX in my portfolio?

FMNDX and FSMDX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMNDX or FSMDX?

FSMDX has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to FMNDX (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMNDX dropped -1.69% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.