PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMNA.NEO vs. FINN.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMNA.NEO vs. FINN.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Market Neutral Alternative Fund ETF Series (FMNA.NEO) and Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMNA.NEO achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly lower than FINN.NEO's 41.97% return.


FMNA.NEO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.09%
YTD
2.42%
6M
3.94%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FINN.NEO

1D
-0.03%
1M
9.97%
YTD
41.97%
6M
40.52%
1Y
73.31%
3Y*
45.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMNA.NEO vs. FINN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FMNA.NEO
Fidelity Market Neutral Alternative Fund ETF Series
2.42%0.59%2.50%
FINN.NEO
Fidelity Global Innovators ETF
41.97%20.61%46.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FMNA.NEO and FINN.NEO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMNA.NEO vs. FINN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMNA.NEO
FMNA.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FMNA.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMNA.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMNA.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FMNA.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMNA.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FINN.NEO
FINN.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FINN.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FINN.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FINN.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FINN.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FINN.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMNA.NEO vs. FINN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Market Neutral Alternative Fund ETF Series (FMNA.NEO) and Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMNA.NEOFINN.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.53

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

6.17

-4.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.89

20.55

-16.66

FMNA.NEO vs. FINN.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMNA.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the FINN.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMNA.NEO and FINN.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMNA.NEOFINN.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

3.30

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

2.12

-1.72

Drawdowns

FMNA.NEO vs. FINN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMNA.NEO drawdown since its inception was -5.37%, smaller than the maximum FINN.NEO drawdown of -25.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMNA.NEO and FINN.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMNA.NEOFINN.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-25.66%

+20.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.85%

-11.94%

+9.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.78%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-4.02%

+2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

3.58%

-2.62%

Volatility

FMNA.NEO vs. FINN.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Market Neutral Alternative Fund ETF Series (FMNA.NEO) is 0.40%, while Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that FMNA.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FINN.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMNA.NEOFINN.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

7.46%

-7.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.45%

17.72%

-14.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.76%

22.35%

-17.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.93%

22.27%

-16.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.93%

22.27%

-16.34%

FMNA.NEO vs. FINN.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMNA.NEO has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FINN.NEO's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMNA.NEO vs. FINN.NEO - Dividend Comparison

Neither FMNA.NEO nor FINN.NEO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FMNA.NEO and FINN.NEO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FINN.NEO is cheaper at 1.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FINN.NEO is cheaper with a 1.13% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for FMNA.NEO.

FMNA.NEO is categorized as Equity Market Neutral, while FINN.NEO is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for FMNA.NEO and 1.13% for FINN.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMNA.NEO and FINN.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer