PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMKT vs. CAOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMKT vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Free Markets ETF (FMKT) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMKT achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.82% return.


FMKT

1D
-2.40%
1M
-0.64%
YTD
2.65%
6M
0.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CAOS

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
0.82%
6M
0.69%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMKT vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FMKT
The Free Markets ETF
2.65%10.93%
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.82%1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FMKT and CAOS is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

-0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMKT vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMKT

CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMKT vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Free Markets ETF (FMKT) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FMKT vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMKTCAOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

1.21

-0.48

Drawdowns

FMKT vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMKT drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMKT and CAOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMKTCAOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-3.60%

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.86%

-1.07%

-5.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-0.90%

-4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

Volatility

FMKT vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMKTCAOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.59%

1.52%

+18.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.59%

4.26%

+15.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

4.26%

+15.33%

FMKT vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMKT has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMKT vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

FMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.00%0.00%
FMKT
The Free Markets ETF
2.10%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMKT and CAOS have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for FMKT.

FMKT has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

FMKT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for FMKT and 0.63% for CAOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMKT and CAOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer