PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMIL vs. USPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMIL vs. USPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FMIL having a 10.26% return and USPX slightly higher at 10.64%.


FMIL

1D
-0.68%
1M
3.15%
YTD
10.26%
6M
11.18%
1Y
26.96%
3Y*
23.20%
5Y*
15.85%
10Y*

USPX

1D
-0.75%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.64%
6M
10.50%
1Y
27.42%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMIL vs. USPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FMIL
Fidelity New Millennium ETF
10.26%17.67%27.89%25.07%-0.04%24.53%18.76%
USPX
Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF
10.64%17.78%24.97%27.07%-18.88%19.53%18.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FMIL and USPX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.88

The correlation between FMIL and USPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FMIL vs. USPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FMIL
USPX

Technology

32.4%
35.4%

Communication Services

11.9%
11.5%

Financial Services

11.1%
11.8%

Industrials

10.8%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.2%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.8%

Energy

4.6%
3.6%

Utilities

2.5%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.8%

Technology

FMIL
32.4%
USPX
35.4%

Communication Services

FMIL
11.9%
USPX
11.5%

Financial Services

FMIL
11.1%
USPX
11.8%

Industrials

FMIL
10.8%
USPX
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FMIL
10.4%
USPX
10.1%

Healthcare

FMIL
8.2%
USPX
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

FMIL
4.7%
USPX
4.8%

Energy

FMIL
4.6%
USPX
3.6%

Utilities

FMIL
2.5%
USPX
2.3%

Basic Materials

FMIL
1.8%
USPX
1.7%

Real Estate

FMIL
1.1%
USPX
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMIL vs. USPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMIL
FMIL Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FMIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMIL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FMIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMIL Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

USPX
USPX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
USPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
USPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
USPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
USPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMIL vs. USPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMILUSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.41

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.01

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.30

13.72

-1.43

FMIL vs. USPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMIL Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the USPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMIL and USPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMILUSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.28

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.77

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.80

+0.37

Drawdowns

FMIL vs. USPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMIL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum USPX drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIL and USPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMILUSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-31.21%

+11.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.98%

-9.15%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

-19.21%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

-24.60%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.75%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-4.44%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

2.00%

+0.20%

Volatility

FMIL vs. USPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) at 2.87%. This indicates that FMIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMILUSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

2.87%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

9.16%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.80%

12.09%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

16.17%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.65%

15.92%

+1.73%

FMIL vs. USPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than USPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMIL vs. USPX - Dividend Comparison

FMIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than USPX's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FMIL
Fidelity New Millennium ETF
1.00%1.10%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USPX
Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF
1.04%1.07%1.23%1.35%2.21%2.40%2.51%3.07%2.91%2.60%4.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FMIL and USPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FMIL has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to USPX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMIL dropped -19.72% vs USPX's -31.21%.

On 5-year performance, FMIL leads with 15.85% vs 12.39% for USPX. On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, USPX has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FMIL has performed better with a 15.85% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FMIL.

USPX has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 1.00% for FMIL.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FMIL and 0.03% for USPX.

USPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMIL and USPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer