PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMIJX vs. GSIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMIJX vs. GSIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FMI International Fund (FMIJX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMIJX achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than GSIFX's 6.83% return. Over the past 10 years, FMIJX has underperformed GSIFX with an annualized return of 5.39%, while GSIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.42% annualized return.


FMIJX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.98%
YTD
0.23%
6M
0.28%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
7.47%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
5.39%

GSIFX

1D
0.50%
1M
4.77%
YTD
6.83%
6M
9.07%
1Y
13.85%
3Y*
11.56%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
9.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMIJX vs. GSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMIJX
FMI International Fund
0.23%8.57%6.99%21.81%-18.67%13.82%0.06%17.11%-9.54%13.90%
GSIFX
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A
6.83%25.51%0.33%15.44%-17.69%16.23%22.89%27.68%-14.85%25.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FMIJX and GSIFX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.83

The correlation between FMIJX and GSIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMIJX vs. GSIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMIJX
FMIJX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FMIJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMIJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMIJX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FMIJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMIJX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIFX
GSIFX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GSIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMIJX vs. GSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMI International Fund (FMIJX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMIJXGSIFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.36

0.88

-0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.64

1.31

-0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.16

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

1.11

-0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.26

4.24

-2.98

FMIJX vs. GSIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMIJX Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the GSIFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMIJX and GSIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMIJXGSIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

0.88

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.37

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.54

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.32

+0.15

Drawdowns

FMIJX vs. GSIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMIJX drawdown since its inception was -37.45%, smaller than the maximum GSIFX drawdown of -59.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIJX and GSIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMIJXGSIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.45%

-59.25%

+21.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.46%

-12.15%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.88%

-13.83%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.77%

-31.94%

+10.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.45%

-35.00%

-2.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.00%

-0.15%

-5.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-15.23%

+10.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

3.18%

+0.85%

Volatility

FMIJX vs. GSIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FMI International Fund (FMIJX) is 3.96%, while Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that FMIJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMIJXGSIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

4.89%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

12.38%

-1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.05%

15.46%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.37%

16.93%

-2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.18%

17.40%

-2.22%

FMIJX vs. GSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMIJX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIFX's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMIJX vs. GSIFX - Dividend Comparison

FMIJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.06%, more than GSIFX's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMIJX
FMI International Fund
13.06%13.09%0.00%0.00%4.43%3.46%0.00%3.55%7.43%0.28%3.76%1.84%
GSIFX
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A
2.04%2.18%2.30%1.37%0.82%6.29%0.00%1.67%1.45%1.25%2.79%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMIJX and GSIFX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSIFX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to FMIJX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMIJX dropped -37.45% vs GSIFX's -59.25%.

GSIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMIJX and GSIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer