FMIJX vs. GSIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about FMI International Fund (FMIJX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX).
FMIJX is managed by FMI Funds. It was launched on Dec 31, 2010. GSIFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
FMIJX vs. GSIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FMIJX vs. GSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMIJX FMI International Fund | -4.05% | 8.57% | 6.99% | 21.81% | -18.67% | 13.82% | 0.06% | 17.11% | -9.54% | 13.90% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | -2.68% | 25.51% | 0.33% | 15.44% | -17.69% | 16.23% | 22.89% | 27.68% | -14.85% | 25.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMIJX achieves a -4.05% return, which is significantly lower than GSIFX's -2.68% return. Over the past 10 years, FMIJX has underperformed GSIFX with an annualized return of 5.15%, while GSIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.66% annualized return.
FMIJX
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -8.34%
- YTD
- -4.05%
- 6M
- -3.39%
- 1Y
- 5.42%
- 3Y*
- 7.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- 5.15%
GSIFX
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -6.64%
- YTD
- -2.68%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- 13.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.60%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FMIJX vs. GSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMIJX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIFX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FMIJX vs. GSIFX — Risk / Return Rank
FMIJX
GSIFX
FMIJX vs. GSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMI International Fund (FMIJX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMIJX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.32 | 0.85 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.58 | 1.24 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.17 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 1.03 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.27 | 4.10 | -2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMIJX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 0.85 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.34 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.50 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.31 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between FMIJX and GSIFX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FMIJX vs. GSIFX - Dividend Comparison
FMIJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.64%, more than GSIFX's 2.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMIJX FMI International Fund | 13.64% | 13.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.43% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 3.55% | 7.43% | 0.28% | 3.76% | 1.84% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | 2.24% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 1.37% | 0.82% | 6.29% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 2.79% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
FMIJX vs. GSIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMIJX drawdown since its inception was -37.45%, smaller than the maximum GSIFX drawdown of -59.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIJX and GSIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMIJX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.45% | -59.25% | +21.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.46% | -12.15% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.77% | -31.94% | +10.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.45% | -35.00% | -2.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.02% | -8.82% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -15.30% | +10.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 3.06% | +0.45% |
Volatility
FMIJX vs. GSIFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FMI International Fund (FMIJX) is 6.11%, while Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that FMIJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FMIJX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 7.31% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.40% | 11.47% | -1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.15% | 17.09% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 16.77% | -2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.06% | 17.34% | -2.28% |