PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMIJX vs. BUFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMIJX vs. BUFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FMI International Fund (FMIJX) and Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMIJX achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly lower than BUFIX's 15.10% return. Over the past 10 years, FMIJX has underperformed BUFIX with an annualized return of 6.24%, while BUFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.84% annualized return.


FMIJX

1D
0.86%
1M
4.25%
6M
7.72%
YTD
11.34%
1Y
16.08%
3Y*
10.18%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
6.24%
ALL TIME*
7.37%

BUFIX

1D
3.23%
1M
-2.38%
6M
9.56%
YTD
15.10%
1Y
20.65%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*
9.84%
ALL TIME*
6.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FMIJX vs. BUFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMIJX
FMI International Fund
11.34%8.57%6.99%21.81%-18.67%13.82%0.06%17.11%-9.54%13.90%
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
15.10%17.09%-1.90%18.33%-21.80%18.20%19.10%28.01%-8.85%29.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FMIJX and BUFIX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2010

0.80

The correlation between FMIJX and BUFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMIJX vs. BUFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMIJX
FMIJX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FMIJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMIJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMIJX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FMIJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMIJX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFIX
BUFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BUFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMIJX vs. BUFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMI International Fund (FMIJX) and Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMIJXBUFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

1.43

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.36

4.81

-1.45

FMIJX vs. BUFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMIJX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the BUFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMIJX and BUFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMIJX vs. BUFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMIJX drawdown since its inception was -37.45%, smaller than the maximum BUFIX drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIJX and BUFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMIJXBUFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.45%

-55.09%

+17.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.46%

-12.85%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.88%

-15.52%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.77%

-34.93%

+13.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.45%

-34.93%

-2.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.04%

+5.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

-9.12%

+4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

3.83%

+0.29%

Volatility

FMIJX vs. BUFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FMI International Fund (FMIJX) is 4.13%, while Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that FMIJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMIJXBUFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

6.64%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.95%

18.16%

-6.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.63%

20.17%

-5.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

18.20%

-3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

17.62%

-2.46%

FMIJX vs. BUFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMIJX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFIX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMIJX vs. BUFIX - Dividend Comparison

FMIJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.75%, more than BUFIX's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
0.74%0.85%0.84%0.59%1.85%1.20%0.28%0.57%2.42%0.36%0.00%0.51%
FMIJX
FMI International Fund
11.75%13.09%0.00%0.00%4.43%3.46%0.00%3.55%7.43%0.28%3.76%1.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMIJX and BUFIX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFIX has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to FMIJX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMIJX dropped -37.45% vs BUFIX's -55.09%.

FMIJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMIJX and BUFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer